Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work

By J. Tomlinson. 2008

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97fc92c527ffd80ba22e00b55b5b962cf3703308

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

Autonomy in Paid Work and Employee Subjective Well-Being (2017, background): “Work can be a source of achievement and fulfilment (Gallie, 2007; Spencer, 2009, p. 105), but it has been argued that autonomy and control are central to employees ‘‘enjoying’’ work (Spencer, 2009, p. 66).”
High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being (2008, background): “It is important in enabling employees ‘to make use of their individual creativity in work and to develop their abilities over time’ (Gallie, 2007: 212), as demonstrated in analysis of the British Skills Survey 2006 (Felstead et al., 2010; Gallie, 2013).”
Perceived job quality in the United States, Great Britain, Norway and West Germany, 1989-2005 (2010, methodology): “PR assumes a more differentiated clustering of countries than VoC, distinguishing social-democratic, liberal and corporatist welfare states (Esping-Andersen, 1990), or inclusive, dual and liberal employment regimes (Gallie, 2007c).”
Work, Jobs and Well-Being Across the Millennium (2009, background): “An early contribution is Glenn and Weaver (1981), and a recent careful econometric analysis is found in Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Van Praag (2004).”
Job types and job quality in Europe (2013, background): “However, this possibility appears unlikely, as research indicates that proximal working conditions play a more important role than distal institutional factors in shaping employee preferences (Gallie, 2007) and there is little evidence that employee preferences unduly distort the perception of objec”
The challenge of job quality (2013, background): “Economists typically focus on pay, sociologists focus on skill and autonomy, and psychologists focus on job satisfaction (see, respectively, Clark, 2005; Gallie, 2007; Holman, 2010).”