Cognitive Aspects of Survey Measurement and Mismeasurement

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique (2010, methodology): “Although accounting for method effects is useful, future investigations should also follow the alternative scientific paradigm of method biases, which has as its basis the recognition that ‘‘reporting errors in surveys arise from problems in the underlying cognitive processes, through which responde”
Improving Survey Methods With Cognitive Interviews in Small- and Medium-Scale Evaluations (2012, background): “Cognitive interviews isolate ‘‘problems in the underlying cognitive processes through which respondents generate their answers to survey questions’’ (Tourangeau, 2003, p. 5).”
Observer ratings of instructional quality: Do they fulfill what they promise? (2012, background): “For a fewyears this deficit has been broached more and more (Tourangeau, 2003).”
How Low Should You Go? Low Response Rates and the Validity of Inference in IS Questionnaire Research (2006, background): “More recently, researchers have adopted an approach that focuses on how people decide whether or not to take part in surveys (Tourangeau, 2003).”
Cognitive Processing of Self-Report Items in Educational Research: Do They Think What We Mean? (2007, background): “We view the present approach as complementary, generalizable, and one that places the issue within the broader framework of Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology.”