Breakdown of Will

By M. El-Sabaawi. 2002

552 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Natural Language Processing, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Natural Language Processing

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Tooling (2021, background): “These include favoring instant gratiﬁcation (Ainslie & George, 2001), and resorting to frugal heuristics to make faster decisions (Kahneman, 2011).”
Guiding the Release of Safer E2E Conversational AI through Value Sensitive Design (2022, background): “These include favouring instant gratification (Ainslie, 2001), and resorting to frugal heuristics to make faster decisions (Kah-neman, 2011).”
Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions (2005, background): “, Ainsle (1992, 2001), Ainsle and Haslam (1992), Frederick et al. (2002) for comprehensive s 3 Psychologists favor a related specification, hyperbolic discounting; see, e.”
Tight junctions and the modulation of barrier function in disease (2008, background): “MMP-9-mediated opening of the BBB then allows ampliWcation of the inXammation, as demonstrated by radioisotopes (Kermode et al. 1990).”
The reasoning skills and thinking dispositions of problem gamblers: a dual‐process taxonomy (2007, unknown): “In addition to such classic frameworks as psychoanalytic theory and Skinnerian learning theory (see Griffiths, 1995, for a review), psychologists have explored gambling behavior through models such as arousal theories (Brown, 1986; Sharpe, Tarrier, Schotte, & Spence, 1995), impulse control theories ”
A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. (2004, background): “In addition, building on the seminal contributions of Ainslie (1975, 1992, 2001), the discounting approach may be applied to topics of general psychological, even clinical, concern, such as self-control, impulsivity, and risk taking (e.g., Bickel & Marsch, 2001; Green & Myerson, 1993; Heyman, 1996;…”
Reinforcement learning: the good, the bad and the ugly. (2008, unknown): “However, the more computationally complex hyperbolic discounting, which shows preference reversals and impulsivity, is a more common psychological finding in humans and animals [61].”
Self-signaling and self-control. (2003, background): “1 In Ainslie’s terms, you “stake the expectation” of longrun success on successful performance in the here and now (Ainslie, 1992; 2001).”
Decision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain (2008, background): “How to trade off immediate and deferred reward optimally depends on subjects’ preferences with respect to temporal discounting (eg Ainslie, 2001; McClure et al., 2004; Kable and Glimcher, 2007).”
Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis (2011, background): “Inconsistent preferences are ubiquitous in human behavior, but addiction characteristically comprises vacillation between powerful inclinations toward and away from the addictive behavior (Ainslie 2001).”
Neural systems implicated in delayed and probabilistic reinforcement (2006, background): “…another aspect of impulsivity: an animal able to forgo short-term poor rewards in order to obtain delayed but better rewards may be termed self-controlled, whereas an animal that cannot tolerate delays to reward may be said to exhibit impulsive choice (Ainslie, 1975, 2001; Evenden, 1999a, 1999b).”
Future Lock-In: Future Implementation Increases Selection of 'Should' Choices (2008, background): “Many researchers and theorists have developed models that resemble this distinction in form (Schelling, 1984; Thaler, 1980) and in function (Ainslie, 2001; Elster, 1979; Loewenstein, 1996).”