Managing the Paradoxes of Mobile Technology

By Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, Karl Reiner Lang. Information systems management, 2005

526 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95e8db1a75393c51c4886cf09d9897544e542a2b

Citations in the corpus

Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites (2009, unknown): “Unfortunately, even skilled users may panic while operating these MSS functions because so many complicated application systems have been placed into such a tiny device, and these “new capabilities often negatively affect users' experience on other dimensions” ( Jarvenpaa and Lang, 2005”
“Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. (2016, unknown): “Perhaps most pertinent to our study, technology has the potential to interrupt face-to-face interactions because of its ever-present and always-on nature (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005; Middleton, 2007).”
Smartphone Use, Work–Home Interference, and Burnout: A Diary Study on the Role of Recovery (2014, unknown): “…to others at any time and any place (Green, 2001); that many users experience great pressure to respond when the phone indicates new messages (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005); that the instant messaging facilitated by smartphones derails work and attention as users are interrupted by incoming…”
Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions (2020, unknown): “The idea of an equivocal behavior of consumers online has more generally been illustrated by Jarvenpaa & Lang (2005) who identified 8 paradoxical situations that result from human–technology interaction: (1) Empowerment/Enslavement; (2) In-dependence/Dependence; (3) Fulfills Needs/Creates Needs;…”
Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments - A qualitative study (2007, unknown): “Focus group interviews have been suggested as a suitable method for explorative studies (Calder, 1977) and previous research has demonstrated their feasibility in studying innovative mobile services (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005).”
Work-Related Communication Technology Use Outside of Regular Work Hours and Work Life Conflict (2014, unknown): “For example, mobile smartphones allow workers to be reached anywhere, whereas employees typically do not carry around laptop computers (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005; Mazmanian et al., 2013), and it would be interesting to explore the extent to which different communication devices contribute to work life…”
Flexible work designs and employee well‐being: examining the effects of resources and demands (2015, unknown): “Several studies associate FWDs with an accumulation of unpredictable demands by allowing and encouraging instantaneous information exchange and requests across time and space (Jarvenpaa and Lang, 2005; Thomas et al., 2006; Perlow, 2012).”
Culture, Conditions and Paradoxical Frames (2017, unknown): “Yet paradoxes emerge disproportionately in specific conditions (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005).”
How Does the Use of Information Communication Technology Affect Individuals? A Work Design Perspective (2020, unknown): “It is a threat to language especially for young people” (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005, p. 14).”
Phubbed and Alone: Phone Snubbing, Social Exclusion, and Attachment to Social Media (2017, unknown): “Several researchers (Mick and Fournier 1998; Lang and Jarvenpaa 2005; Turkle 2011) have observed that the near-universal availability and everexpanding capabilities of the smartphone have led to two paradoxes: (1) the present-absent paradox (alone together) and the (2) freeing-enslaving paradox.”
New Ways of Working: Impact on Working Conditions, Work–Family Balance, and Well-Being (2014, unknown): “There are indications that the blurring of boundaries leads to a deteriorated work-family balance (e.g., Derks and Bakker 2011; Jarvenpaa and Lang 2005).”
Smartphone use and work-home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement (2015, unknown): “However, research on smartphoneuse has also consistently shown that theboundaries betweenwork and family life become permeable (e.g., Green, 2002; Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005), which may increase the risk of an imbalance between work and family life (e.g., Davis, 2002; Higgins & Duxbury, 2005).”
E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress (2011, unknown): “Those who offer advice on how to reduce communication overload also typically advise people to regain control by deploying a technology’s material features more effectively, for example, using e-mail filters or the mute button on a cell phone (Jarvenpaa and Lang 2005, Dabbish and Kraut 2006).”
Understanding the consequences of public social media use for work (2017, unknown): “…technologies (ICTs; e.g., email or smartphones) have demonstrated the value of taking opposing consequences into account (e.g., Fonner & Roloff, 2012; Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005; Leonardi, Treem, & Jackson, 2010; Mazmanian, Orlikowski, & Yates, 2013; Ter Hoeven, van Zoonen, & Fonner, 2016).”
Technology interference in the parenting of young children: Implications for mothers’ perceptions of coparenting (2016, unknown): “For example, some individuals speak of being pulled toward their technology and experiencing difficulty resisting the urge to check their devices (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005; Middleton & Cukier, 2006; Oulasvirta, Rattenbury, Ma, & Raita, 2012; Rainie & Keeter, 2006), perhaps even in parenting…”