Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments - A qualitative study
By Niina Mallat. Journal of strategic information systems, 2007
1,116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4b26fd519e327a325f733fc286976993cf2a319
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Ali Abdallah Alalwan
- Kuttimani Tamilmani
- Michael D. Williams
- Pushp P. Patil
- Vishnupriya Raghavan
- Neena Sinha
In Marketing
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Jascha‐Alexander Koch
- Michael Siering
- Peter Gomber
- Ibrahim M. Al-Jabri
- Yao-bin Lu
- Rui Zhang
In Strategy and Management
- Tao Zhou
- Ibrahim M. Al-Jabri
- Jascha‐Alexander Koch
- Yao-bin Lu
- Rui Zhang
- M. S. Sohail
- Nidhi Singh
- Vishanth Weerakkody
Citations in the corpus
- A generalised adoption model for services: A cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health) (2016, background): “Consumer behaviour researchers have acknowledged that an intertwined effect of social and psychological phenomena has enormous impact on consumers’ preference to buy any product (Mallat, 2007).”
- Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions (2017, positive): “Mallat (2007) defines mobile payment as ‘‘the use of a mobile device to conduct a payment transaction in which money or funds are transferred from payer to receiver via an intermediary, or directly, without an intermediary’’.”
- Dynamics between the trust transfer process and intention to use mobile payment services: A cross-environment perspective (2011, background): “In the mobile payment environment, previous studies suggest that one of the key attributes contributing to the relative advantage of mobile technologies is independence of location and time [7,12].”
- Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal (2020, background): “In addition, the study identified several barriers to adoption such as premium pricing, complexity, a lack of critical mass, and perceived risks (Mallat, 2007).”
- Mobile payment services adoption across time: An empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits (2012, background): “Compatibility (adapted from Moore and Benbasat (1991)).”
- User Intentions to Adopt Mobile Payment Services: A Study of Early Adopters in Thailand (2015, background): “This finding is only in line with prior M-payment adoption studies (Chandra et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2011; Mallat, 2007; Shin, 2010; Yan et al., 2009; Zhou, 2011) but also suggests that M-payment service providers (e.g. banks, mobile network operators, and third parties) need to pay attention to…”
- The emergence of the global fintech market: economic and technological determinants (2016, background): “Others have analyzed social trading platforms (Doering et al., 2015), roboadvisors (Fein, 2015), and mobile payment and e-wallet services (Mjølsnes and Rong, 2003; Mallat et al., 2004, Mallat, 2007).”
- Exploring consumer adoption of proximity mobile payments (2014, background): “Mallat (2007) suggests that consumer adoption behaviour in relation to MP is a key issue.”
- An empirical study of customers' perceptions of security and trust in e-payment systems (2010, background): “This is consistent with the findings of the previous studies (Tsiakis and Sthephanides 2005, Mallat 2007), which suggest that trust is more important than security.”
- An Empirical Examination of Initial Trust in Mobile Banking (2011, methodology): “Information technology adoption theories such as TAM, IDT and UTAUT are often used as the theoretical bases.”