“Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being.

By Brandon T. McDaniel, Sarah M. Coyne. 2016

564 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc065e1feb4110a24c27dadb0a60d672f499c8ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length (2017, background): “Technoference, which is similar to partner phubbing, is defined as everyday intrusions or interruptions in couple interactions or time spent together that occur due to technology including cell or smart phones (McDaniel & Coyne, 2016).”
Technology interference in the parenting of young children: Implications for mothers’ perceptions of coparenting (2016, methodology): “In ine with prior research (e.g., McDaniel & Coyne,2016), e expected that technology interference in coparenting elationships would be related to lower well-being in relaionships and at the individual level.”
Problematic Use of Social Networking Sites: Antecedents and Consequence from a Dual-System Theory Perspective (2016, unknown): “different instances of problematic uses of technology, such as “prohibited use” [12], “dangerous use” (aka, “risky use”) [12, 15], “technoference” [56], and “dysfunctional use” [15].”
Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions (2017, methodology): “Our research may also serve as a model for future experimental studies, given that the literature on phones and well-being has disproportionately utilized correlational designs (Brown et al., 2016; Kushlev & Heintzelman, in press; Misra et al., 2014; Rotondi et al., 2017).”
My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners (2016, background): “In a study of the impact of technology interference on relationship well-being, McDaniel and Coyne (2014) found that technology interference (Computers, TV, iPads, cell phones, etc.) caused conflict over technology use within romantic relationships.”
Technoference: Parent Distraction with Technology and Associations with Child Behavior Problems (2017, background): “…literature showing associations between greater digital technology use and potential relationship dysfunction (e.g., McDaniel & Coyne, 2016a; McDaniel & Coyne, 2016b) or changes in interpersonal interactions (Przybylski & Weinstein, 2013). r Although some professional societies such as Zero…”
Phubbed and Alone: Phone Snubbing, Social Exclusion, and Attachment to Social Media (2017, background): “…date have addressed phubbing-like behavior, and most of these focus specifically on romantic relationships and show that phubbing-like behaviors undermine the perceived quality of romantic relationships (Coyne et al. 2011; Lenhart and Duggan 2014; McDaniel and Coyne 2014; Roberts and David 2016).”
Boss phubbing, trust, job satisfaction and employee performance (2020, methodology): “With the ubiquitous status of smartphones (Yueh, Lu, & Lin, 2015), it is incumbent upon researchers to investigate how the use of these devices impacts relationships (McDaniel & Coyne, 2014).”