A problem of multiple comparisons

By J. Neher. 2011

672 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95b4fe7aa4a1846139bc748e53ea769225b278b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Rbio: A tool for biometric and statistical analysis using the R platform (2017, methodology): “189 Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology - 17: 187-190, 2017 For the aforementioned models, the following means tests can be processed: Tukey (Tukey 1953), SNK (Student 1927, Newman 1939, Keuls 1952), Scheffe (Scheffé 1959), Duncan (Duncan 1955), Dunnet (Dunnet 1955).”
Usage of public corporate communications of social responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) (2010, methodology): “Using Tukey’s (1953) honestly significant differences method, Table V reports the post hoc test results.”
nparcomp: An R Software Package for Nonparametric Multiple Comparisons and Simultaneous Confidence Intervals (2015, methodology): “The procedures allow for testing arbitrary contrasts, e.g., Dunnett-type, Tukey-type or changepoint comparisons (Hirotsu 1997) and take the correlation between the test statistics into account.”
When to adjust alpha during multiple testing: a consideration of disjunction, conjunction, and individual testing (2021, background): “…within the same study (see also Cook & Farewell, 1996; Fisher, 1971, p. 206; Greenland, 2020, p. 5; Hurlbert & Lombardi, 2012, p. 30; Kotzen, 2013; Parker & Weir, 2020, p. 2; Rubin, 2017b, pp. 271–272; Savitz & Olshan, 1995, p. 906; Senn, 2007, p. 150; Tukey, 1953, pp. 82–83; Wilson, 1962).”
Probabilistic Template-Based Chord Recognition (2011, methodology): “We therefore propose to perform a Tukey–Kramer’s test [35], [36] on the Overlap Scores.”
Design and Analysis of Experiments (2001, unknown): “and Wu (1980), Kackar (1985), and Taguchi (1987, 1991)] had a significant impact on expanding the interest in and use of designed experiments.”
Evaluation of grain distillers dried yeast as a fish meal substitute in practical-type diets of juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (2014, methodology): “Following ANOVA, differences among means were separated using the Tukey–Kramer procedure for pairwise comparisons (Kramer, 1956; Tukey, 1953) when treatment effects were considered significant at P≤ 0.”
LOPSIDED REASONING ON LOPSIDED TESTS AND MULTIPLE COMPARISONS (2012, background): “Key elements of the framework are that, for individual tests: a comparison-wise type I error rate (α C or CWER) is not specified, the terms 'significant' and 'non-significant' are not used, high P-values lead only to suspended judgment, more nuanced verbal characterization of results is demanded, an”