Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical test

By N. Hanley, Wiktor L. Adamowicz, Robert E. Wright. 2005

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/955349bcf61f9e3587b2c847ba801bf1d6845760

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. S. B. Olsen
2. N. Hanley
3. David Hoyos
4. Jordan J. Louviere
5. Riccardo Scarpa
6. J. Ladenburg
7. Emily Lancsar
8. Roy Brouwer

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Emily Lancsar
2. Jordan J. Louviere
3. J. Ladenburg
4. David Hoyos
5. Roy Brouwer
6. Christian A. Vossler
7. R. Johnston
8. Riccardo Scarpa

In Ocean Engineering

1. Jordan J. Louviere
2. Emily Lancsar
3. S. B. Olsen
4. Roy Brouwer
5. Christian A. Vossler
6. Riccardo Scarpa
7. N. Hanley
8. William Michael Hanemann

Citations in the corpus

• German car buyers’ willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions (2012, unknown): “In a choice experiment, however, the scaling of the price vector may be influential in terms of WTP estimates, though existing evidence is ambiguous (see e.g., Carlsson and Martinsson 2008; Hanley et al. 2005).”
• Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making (2012, methodology): “For example, if there are A attributes and all Hanley et al.[54] used an experiment to study the have L levels, the full factorial is LA.”
• The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments (2010, background): “The empirical evidence suggests, however, that when accounting for scale effects, the structure of preferences andWTP estimates is not significantly different when changing the price vector (Hanley et al., 2005).”
• Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “…2012; Hole, Kolstad, and Gyrd-Hansen 2013), omitted attributes (Petrin and Train 2003), bid amount effects (Boyle, Johnson, and McCollum 1997; Hanley, Adamowicz, and Wright 2005), statistical power (Vossler 2016), and effects of the chosen optimization criteria (Yao et al. 2015; Olsen and…”
• Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical study (2008, background): “Hanley et al. [ 32 ] and Ohler et al. [64] find no effect of changing the price vector used whereas Carlsson and Martinsson [21] and Ryan and Wordsworth [68] find the opposite.”