German car buyers’ willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions
By Martin Achtnicht. Climatic Change, 2012
239 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d6d5b7944ba2ef797a06ecab6460ed4a5d59a4e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- André Hackbarth
- Elisabetta Cherchi
- Reinhard Madlener
- S. Carattini
- Juan Dios Ortúzar
- H. A. Bekhet
- Y. Sang
- Anders Fjendbo Jensen
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Elisabetta Cherchi
- André Hackbarth
- Reinhard Madlener
- S. Carattini
- H. A. Bekhet
- Y. Sang
- A. Baranzini
- Z. Wadud
Citations in the corpus
- Willingness-to-Pay for Alternative Fuel Vehicle Characteristics: A Stated Choice Study for Germany (2014, methodology): “Achtnicht (2012) applied a mixed (random parameters) logit model to analyze the importance of CO2 emissions in vehicle choice decisions and the differences in the WTP for an emission mitigation between groups of potential car buyers (distinguishable by gender, age, and education).”
- Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: an empirical study in Malaysia (2015, background): “In a study on German consumers, it was significantly found that younger individuals preferred low-emission vehicles more than older individuals (Achtnicht, 2012).”
- What make consumer sign up to PHEVs? Predicting Malaysian consumer behavior in adoption of PHEVs (2018, unknown): “Furthermore, the previous studies mention that the intention to purchase a PHEV may be pretentious by using a demographic variable, such as age, gender, educational level, and household income (Achtnicht, 2012; Gadenne et al., 2011).”
- Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis (2013, methodology): “Our study builds on the rich body of literature on the demand for AFVs, which has been primarily carried out in the US (Beggs et al., 1981; Calfee, 1985; Bunch et al., 1993; Golob et al., 1993; Brownstone and Train, 1999; Brownstone et al., 2000; Axsen et al., 2009; Hidrue et al., 2011; Musti and Ko”
- Using extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to predict adoption intention of electric vehicles in India (2020, unknown): “The concept of moral norm is purely intrinsic in nature, and unlike the subjective norm, there is no external pressure and the decision taken here is purely based on moral values/ principles (Achtnicht 2012; Wang et al.”
- Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data (2017, background): “2001; Achtnicht 2012; Loeschel et al. 2013). In column (2) we introduce variables on environmental attitudes. This allows us to test the hypotheses H3 and H5. We find that being a priori in favor of a carbon tax has a very large effect on acceptability. This confirms H5 and provides evidence for the”
- A long panel survey to elicit variation in preferences and attitudes in the choice of electric vehicles (2014, background): “2011) while several studies (Bunch et al. 1993; Batley et al. 2004; Horne et al. 2005; Potoglou and Kanaroglou 2007; Bolduc et al. 2008; Achtnicht 2012; Hackbarth and Madlener 2013) have included fuel availability, mostly as a percentage of conventional fuel stations where it is possible to charge t”