Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making

By Emily Lancsar, Jordan J. Louviere. PharmacoEconomics (Auckland), 2012

1,592 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. (2013, background): “are directed to several systematic reviews of conjoint-analysis applications in health care [5–13] and several methodological reviews [6,14–18].”
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide (2015, background): “Lancsar and Louviere [9], and Ryan et al.”
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. (2016, methodology): “The application of DCEs to measuring preferences for health and health care has benefited from a growing literature on methods [35–39], including the two previous conjoint analysis task force reports from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, methodology): “SP questionnaire design should follow best practices applicable to all types of survey research (see Bateman et al. 2002; Kanninen 2006; Lancsar and Louviere 2008; Groves et al. 2009; Bridges et al. 2011; Rossi, Wright, and Anderson 2013; Dillman, Smyth, and Christian 2014; Champ, Boyle, and Brown…”