The organisation of the bilingual lexicon: a PET study

By R. D. Bleser, Patrick Dupont, J. Postler, G. Bormans, D. Speelman, L. Mortelmans, Mark Debrock. 2003

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9349fc0600030c5eaa396e57575cc86a57dcf11c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Bilingual Minds (2009, background): “De Bleser et al. (2003) examined covert picture naming in an L1 and a later-acquired L2.”
A Meta‐analysis of Hemodynamic Studies on First and Second Language Processing: Which Suggested Differences Can We Trust and What Do They Mean? (2006, result): “The two bilingual studies reporting stronger activation of the left posterior IFG in L2 as compared to L1 picture-naming (De Bleser et al., 2003; Vingerhoets et al., 2003) both had participants with late L2 onset and variable L2 exposure.”
Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production (2011, unknown): “Across five haemodynamic studies comparing L1 and L2 picture naming within participants (De Bleser et al., 2003; Hernandez, Martinez, & Kohnert, 2000; Vingerhoets et al., 2003), no brain region was replicated as being more strongly activated for L1 compared to L2 picture naming. The reversed compari”
Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control (2007, background): “…lexical retrieval L2 related brain activations were found in identical left frontal and temporo-parietal brain areas (Chee, Tan, & Thiel, 1999; De Bleser et al., 2003; Hernandez, Dapretto, Mazziotta, & Bookheimer, 2001; Hernandez, Martinez, & Kohnert 2000; Perani et al., 2003; Yetkin, Yetkin,…”
How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition (2010, methodology): “Brain activity during cognate processing is also under study using electrophysiological and neuroimaging methods (e.g., De Bleser et al., 2003; Dijkstra, van Hell, & Brenders, in preparation).”
Age and Second Language Acquisition and Processing: A Selective Overview (2006, background): “…" is also quite variable, with tasks ranging from word repetition (Klein, Zatorre, Milner, Meyer, & Evans, 1994), to (typically cued) word generation (Chee, Tan, & Thiel, 1999; Klein et al., 1995), to sentence generation (Kim et al., 1997), to cognate and noncognate naming (De Bleser et al., 2003).”