Do Women Directors Improve Firm Performance in China

By Yu Liu, Zuobao Wei, Feixue Xie. 2014

1,138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/934620f5bb6ac81e03b48aa4638d924873f812bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Gender Studies

Citations in the corpus

The impact of cultural diversity in corporate boards on firm performance (2016, neutral): “This aspect of cultural diversity could explain, for instance, the findings of Masulis et al. (2012) who demonstrate that firms with foreign independent directors make better cross-border acquisitions when the targets are from their home country.”
Women on board and performance of family firms: Evidence from India (2015, neutral): “…Approaches http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/increasing-gender-diversity-boards-current-index-formal-approaches diversity on firm performance (Liu et al., 2014; Nguyen et al., 2015), and that the effect can be sensitive to the quality of firm level corporate governance as manifested in the…”
Female CEOs and Core Earnings Quality: New Evidence on the Ethics Versus Risk-Aversion Puzzle (2018, neutral): “1 3 suggest that gender has a positive effect on firm performance/value (Carter et al. 2003; Gul et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2014; Ntim 2015; Shrader et al. 1997).”
Women on board: does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? (2016, background): “…firm outcomes such as board attendance, lower M&A bid premiums and less risky business decisions (e.g. Levi, Li, and Zhang, 2013; Adams and 4 Ragunathan, 2013), evidence linking gender diversity to firm performance is less conclusive (e.g. Adams and Ferreira, 2009; Liu, Wei, and Xie, 2014).”
Does gender diversity on banks' boards matter? Evidence from public bailouts (2020, background): “The latter is measured as the ratio of the market value of equity plus the face value of debt divided by the book value of equity plus the face value of the debt (Lindenberg and Ross, 1981; Adams and Ferreira, 2009; Onali et al., 2016).”
Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market (2017, methodology): “…‘‘1’’ indicates the company with negative earnings, while ‘‘0’’ with positive earnings In order to resolve the endogeneity bias for EDULE-VEL, AGE and TENURE, we run instrumental variables (IV) regression with 2SLS estimator consistent with the prior literature (Liu et al. 2014; Low et al. 2015).”