AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language
By A. Graesser, Shulan Lu, G. T. Jackson, Heather H. Mitchell, M. Ventura, Andrew McGregor Olney, Max M. Louwerse. Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers, 2004
583 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92bed1ffb5d5eb17a5d45d0e8f784c46caaa693c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- A. Graesser
- S. D’Mello
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Xiangen Hu
- Benjamin D. Nye
- Max M. Louwerse
- John Dexter Fletcher
- Kurt VanLehn
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- A. Graesser
- S. D’Mello
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Kurt VanLehn
- Patricia A. Alexander
- Richard E. Mayer
- Olusola O. Adesope
- John Dexter Fletcher
Citations in the corpus
- The Behavior of Tutoring Systems (2006, background): “org/) teaches by engaging students in a natural language (English) dialogue (Graesser et al., 2004; Graesser et al., 2003; Graesser, WiemerHastings, Wiemer-Hastings, & Kreuz, 1999; Person, Graesser, Bautista, Mathews, & TRG, 2001) For AutoTutor, a task corresponds to a single question, such as the o”
- Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments (2010, result): “Similar results were reported in a version of AutoTutor on the subject matter of computer literacy (Graesser et al., 2004).”
- Scaffolding Deep Comprehension Strategies Through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART (2005, background): “AutoTutor is a computer tutor that attempts to simulate the dialogue moves of a human tutor (Graesser, Lu, et al., 2004; Graesser, Person & Harter, 2001; Graesser, VanLehn, Rose, Jordan, & Harter, 2001).”
- Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning (2011, unknown): “Accordingly, evaluative studies of specific pedagogical agents such as “AutoTutor” or “Ore-Age” (Graesser, Chipman, Haynes, & Olney, 2005; Graesser et al., 2004; Guray, Celebi, Atalay, & Pasamehmetoglu, 2003), or the prototypes “CoPAS”, “SA-Agent” and “Rule-Editor” (Morch, Dolonen, & Naevdal,…”
- Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor (2004, methodology): “The 34 undergraduate participants were observed individually while they worked with AutoTutor.”
- Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011, background): “Thus, children were taught to move based on elite, adult movement models rather than developmentally appropriate patterns such as those that Roberton (1982) described.”
- Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition (2011, methodology): “AutoTutor uses LSA for its model of the world knowledge serving as a model of the long-term memory of a conversational partner and determining the semantic association between a student answer, and ideal good and bad answers (Graesser, VanLehn, Rose, Jordan, & Harter, 2001; Graesser et al., 2004).”
- Dynamics of affective states during complex learning (2012, background): “The impact of AutoTutor in facilitating the learning of deep conceptual knowledge has been validated in over a dozen experiments on college students (Graesser et al., 2004; VanLehn et al., 2007).”
- Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis (2014, methodology): “AutoTutor is an ITS that supports natural language dialogue for instruction that, like much observed human tutoring, involves " imprecise verbal content , a low to medium level of user knowledge about a topic, and earnest literal replies " (Graesser et al., 2004, p. 181).”
- Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features (2010, background): “The impact of AutoTutor in facilitating the learning of deep conceptual knowledge has been validated in more than a dozen experiments on college students (Graesser et al. 2004; Storey et al. (in press); VanLehn et al. 2007).”
- AutoTutor and Family: A Review of 17 Years of Natural Language Tutoring (2014, methodology): “This foreshadowed a pattern of higher learning gains for deep reasoning with AutoTutor (Graesser et al. 2004b, 2010).”
- Detection of Emotions during Learning with AutoTutor (2006, background): “…that college students experience while interacting with AutoTutor, an intelligent tutoring system that helps students learn by holding a conversation in natural language (Graesser, Chipman, Haynes, & Olney, 2005; Graesser et al., 2004; Graesser, Person, & Harter, 2001; VanLehn et al., in press).”