Promoting an open research culture

By Brian A. Nosek, G. Alter, G. Banks, Denny Borsboom, S. Bowman, S. J. Breckler, S. Buck, C. Chambers, G. Chin, G. Christensen and 29 more. Science, 2015

2,166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility Transparency, openness, and reproducibility are readily recognized as vital features of science (1, 2). When asked, most scientists embrace these features as disciplinary norms and values (3). Therefore, one might expect that these valued features would be routine in daily practice. Yet, a growing body of evidence suggests that this is not the case (4–6).

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/927a32a1b1c69a6041a586b71f52be1b957e5030

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

The Power of Bias in Economics Research (2017, background): “Several options have been proposed on how journals can respond to enhance reproducible research (Nosek et al., 2015).”
Entrepreneurial Passion: A Review, Synthesis, and Agenda for Future Research (2019, background): “This would also follow an open and transparent research culture as it becomes more mainstream in the social science such as psychology (Nosek et al., 2015).”
Field experiments across the social sciences (2017, background): “…to replicate numerous others (Nosek et al. 2015a) show.16 More than other methods, however, experiments are subject to strong—and intensifying (Nosek et al. 2015b)—norms of preregistration and data sharing, particularly in those fields, such as economics and political science, where the…”
Promoting Open Science to Increase the Trustworthiness of Evidence in Special Education (2018, background): “For example, the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines provide a policy framework for journals, funders, and institutions to increase transparency and credibility of research (Nosek et al., 2015).”
An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility (2018, methodology): “This is in compliance with Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines at Level 2 (6) and Recommendation 6 of the Reproducibility Enhancement Principles in ref.”
An Agenda for Open Science in Communication (2020, background): “crisis, a growing number of scholars have called for more transparent and open science practices (Nosek et al., 2015).”
Non-durable consumption and housing net worth in the Great Recession: Evidence from easily accessible data (2016, positive): “This view is in linewith the recent recognition of the importance of replicability in the physical sciences and other social sciences (Begley and Ioannidis, 2015; Munafò et al., 2017; Nosek et al., 2015).”
On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications (2017, background): “The study should fully describe its methods and procedures so that other researchers are able to faithfully reproduce it (see Atwater, et al., 2014; Cortina, et al., 2016; Goodman, Fanelli, & Ioannidis, 2016; Nosek et al., 2015); computational steps taken to arrive at analyzed datasets”
Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis (2018, background): “The OSF provides a pragmatic infrastructure for in studies (De Angelis et al. 2005).”