Understanding the Nature and Role of Spirituality in Relation to Coping and Health: A Conceptual Framework.
By T. L. Gall, C. Charbonneau, N. Clarke, Karen Grant, Anosh Joseph, Lisa Shouldice. 2005
351 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91b83851534c4c911efd377345381b774ed021ba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Health
- Karen M. O’Brien
- Elizabeth Kelley
- Margaret C. McKee
- A. Newton
- C. Driscoll
- Marianne Dunn
- Daniel N. McIntosh
- E. Kevin Kelloway
In Sociology and Political Science
- Chris Ernst
- Karen M. O’Brien
- A. Newton
- Marianne Dunn
- Daniel N. McIntosh
- E. Kevin Kelloway
- Gary P. Latham
- Adam M. Grant
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring linkages among transformational leadership, workplace spirituality and well-being in health care workers (2011, background): “2005 ), we draw on recent organizational research that suggests aspects of workplace spirituality may be influenced by aspects of the workplace, such as leadership (e.”
- Psychological Health and Meaning in Life (2009, background): “” Self-directed religious coping may be generally a positive religious coping style (gall et al., 2005); however, this coping style may be maladaptive when the problem is uncontrollable (Pargament, 1997) and has been related to poorer spiritual outcome and less stress-related growth (Pargament et al”
- Specific Religious Beliefs in a Cognitive Appraisal Model of Stress and Coping (2010, background): “Second, when religion is considered in a more complex manner in the coping literature, constructs such as religious coping strategies and religious appraisals are typically emphasized rather than religious beliefs as individual difference variables (cf. Gall et al., 2005; Pargament, 1997).”
- Keys to motivating tomorrow's workforce (2006, background): “Kanfer and Heggestad (1997) and Heggestad and Kanfer (2000) proposed a self-regulatory/self monitoring theory of personality. The theory distinguishes between distal influences on the actions people take, namely personality traits, versus proximal influences, namely self-regulatory motivational skil”