A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance

1,040 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany (2011, background): “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be defined as a company’s voluntary contribution to sustainable development which goes beyond legal requirements (Bowen 1953; Carroll 1999, 2006; Crane and Matten 2007; De Bakker et al. 2005 ).”
The influence of corporate social responsibility on employee satisfaction (2016, neutral): “…the literature a variety 2326 MD 54,9 D ow nl oa de d by U ni ve rs ity o f Y or k A t 0 2: 18 0 6 O ct ob er 2 01 6 (P T ) of theoretical perspectives, conceptual approaches, and empirical traditions, but also a lack of consensus on critical concepts (De Bakker et al., 2005; Lockett et al., 2006).”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance (2012, result): “This is certainly reflected by some of the meta studies of the CSR literature (De Bakker et al., 2005; Lockett et al., 2006) as well as more critical analysis of CSR as a subfield of management (Banerjee, 2007; Hanlon, 2008).”
Small-Business Owner-Managers’ Perceptions of Business Ethics and CSR-Related Concepts (2011, background): “Further, marketing labels dreamed up by consultants and new concepts launched by academics amplify the confusion in a competition to establish a dominant concept (De Bakker et al., 2005).”