Diagnostic Assessment With Ordered Multiple-Choice Items
By Derek C. Briggs, Alicia C. Alonzo, Cheryl Schwab, Mark R. Wilson. 2006
283 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/913dbe79be50fc5acd4278d05a04ac08bd6cd38d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Education
- Julia Plummer
- Joseph Krajcik
- Mark J. Gierl
- Qi Guo
- Xinxin Zhang
- Alicia C. Alonzo
- Okan Bulut
- Elizabeth A. Davis
Citations in the corpus
- Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth‐based perspective (2010, background): “The researchers’ goal ‘‘was to create a single continuum to be used to describe students’ understanding’’ (Briggs et al., 2006, p. 40) of the day/night cycle, phases of the moon, and the seasons.”
- An argument for formative assessment with science learning progressions (2018, background): “For ordered multiple-choice (OMC; Briggs et al., 2006) and multiple true/false (MTF; e.”
- Developing, Analyzing, and Using Distractors for Multiple-Choice Tests in Education: A Comprehensive Review (2017, methodology): “These common misconceptions can be identified either by reviewing responses to constructed-response and open-ended items or by consulting with content specialists (Briggs et al., 2006; Haladyna & Rodriguez, 2013).”