The translation of corporate governance changes across national cultures: the case of Germany

By T. Buck, Azura Shahrim. 2005

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f29f2c7d8017a9b5bc112ba4bacd0a8b53db1e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Gregory Jackson
3. Richard Deeg
4. Toru Yoshikawa
5. Abdul Rasheed
6. Ilir Haxhi
7. S. Chiu
8. A. Bruce

In Strategy and Management

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Gregory Jackson
3. Ilir Haxhi
4. Richard Deeg
5. S. Chiu
6. Abdul Rasheed
7. A. Bruce
8. Richard A. Johnson

Citations in the corpus

• An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities (2008, unknown): “representation on the board may have important effects on the design of executive stock option plans, leading to adoption of more and qualitatively stricter performance conditions than similar U.S. companies ( Buck and Shahrim 2005 ).”
• Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business (2008, background): “For example, studies on the adoption of shareholder value practices by German firms suggest that different sorts of firm are more or less likely to adopt them, and will often adapt them to the German context (Buck & Shahrim, 2005).”
• Explaining diversity in the worldwide diffusion of codes of good governance (2010, background): “and Buck and Shahrim (2005) argue that both national culture and institutions have crucial implications for corporate governance systems.”
• Institutional Investors and Institutional Environment: A Comparative Analysis and Review (2010, background): “…Ltd and Society for the Advancement of Management Studies the concentrated ownership of German firms, only small percentages of equity are available for purchase, so liquidity is low and information disclosure is poor, further reinforcing the power of the informed banks (Buck and Shahrim, 2005).”
• Convergence of Corporate Governance: Critical Review and Future Directions (2009, background): “Some engage in local tailoring (Westney, 1993) or local translation (Buck, Shahrim and Winter, 2004; Buck and Shahrim, 2005 ) by modifying foreign practices to suit the local institutional and cultural context and creating hybrid systems (Jackson, 2003).”
• Top Executive Remuneration: A View from Europe (2005, background): “Thus the adoption of illegitimate organizational innovations, inconsistent with existing local institutions, may be resisted, or at least ‘translated’ to give the appearance of adoption (Buck and Shahrim, 2005).”
• Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, background): “For instance, Ahmadjian and Robbins ( 2005 ), Buck and Shahrim ( 2005 ), Djelic ( 1998 ), P.”