The production of gesture and speech
By J. D. Ruiter. 2000
436 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e30c5a00fd107be5981e96b55a7bceb1ba582a1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Sotaro Kita
- Martha W. Alibali
- Asli Ozyurek
- S. Goldin‐Meadow
- Emiel Krahmer
- Howard C. Nusbaum
- Susan M. Wagner
- Marc Swerts
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sotaro Kita
- Asli Ozyurek
- J. Bobis
- Fang‐Tzu Hu
- Emiel Krahmer
- Marc Swerts
- S. Goldin‐Meadow
- Howard C. Nusbaum
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Sotaro Kita
- S. Goldin‐Meadow
- Marc Swerts
- Howard C. Nusbaum
- Paul Ginns
- Emiel Krahmer
- Janet Beavin Bavelas
- Susan M. Wagner
Citations in the corpus
- What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking (2003, methodology): “Finally, as suggested by de Ruiter (1998, 2000), the Action Generator has access to the environment.”
- Do Speakers Design Their Cospeech Gestures for Their Addressees? The Effects of Addressee Location on Representational Gestures (2002, background): “Howev according to De Ruiter (2000), who believ that gestures are communicative, gestures o nate in the conceptualizer since both speech gesture convey the communicative intention r c a a h , a 9 a y t h io d aryrato e of ne te a ing eate eclly he l of stiacee in dby ceide the inrecrects nd, a the…”
- Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. (2008, background): “However, we were not seeking to undermine cognitive theories of gestures because, like many other gesture researchers, we do not see communicative and cognitive theories as incompatible (e.g., Bavelas, 1994; O ¨ zyu ¨ rek, 2002; de Ruiter, 2000, 2006 ).”
- The Effects of Visual Beats on Prosodic Prominence: Acoustic Analyses, Auditory Perception and Visual Perception. (2007, methodology): “This can be illustrated by comparing various models for the combination of spoken language and manual gestures that were recently proposed, such as those of Kita and O ¨ zyu ¨ rek (2003), Krauss, Chen, and Chawla (1996), and de Ruiter (2000) , all based on the speech production model described by L”
- Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning (2015, background): “…activate and maintain mental images in working memory for lexical search, which is supported by the evidence that participants produce more gestures when describing a spatial image from memory than when the image is visually accessible (de Ruiter, 2000; Wesp, Hesse, Keutmann, & Wheaton, 2001).”
- Probing the Mental Representation of Gesture: Is Handwaving Spatial?. (2004, result): “The findings therefore do not lend support to theories in which visuospatial representation is considered the key to gesture (Alibali , Kita, & Young, 2000; De Ruiter, 2000; Hadar et al., 1998; Hadar & Butterworth, 1997; Kita, 2000; Rauscher, Krauss, & Chen, 1996).”