Electrical neuroimaging of memory discrimination based on single-trial multisensory learning

By Antonia Thelen, Céline Cappe, Micah M. Murray. 2012

67 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Multisensory integration: flexible use of general operations (2014, unknown): “Recognition is enhanced if the initial multisensory experience had been semantically congruent and can be impaired if this multisensory pairing was either semantically incongruent or entailed meaningless information in the task-irrelevant modality, when compared to objects encountered exclusively in”
The role of auditory cortices in the retrieval of single‐trial auditory–visual object memories (2015, background): “Our current and prior (Thelen et al., 2012) findings collectively show that there is an inverse relationship between the direction of responses within auditory cortices and memory performance.”
Flexibility and Stability in Sensory Processing Revealed Using Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution (2014, background): “…by testing the recognition of images which were initially viewed without accompanying sound, with an ecological accompanying sound (an image of a bell and a “dong” sound), and images accompanied by arbitrary meaningless sounds, without any training (Murray et al. 2004, 2005; Thelen et al. 2012).”
Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes (2016, background): “Only nodes exceeding the spatial extent criterion of at least 17 contiguous significant nodes (P 0.0002) were considered significant [see Thelen et al., 2012 for similar spatial criterion].”
The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories. (2013, methodology): “Most recently, Thelen et al. (2012) used electrical neuroimaging analyses of ERPs to show that brain responses to repeated visual objects differed according to whether the initial encounter was exclusively visual or had included a meaningless sound.”
The multisensory function of the human primary visual cortex. (2016, background): “…been shown to activate visual cortices as a function of prior multisensory experiences (Zangenehpour and Zatorre, 2010; Meylan and Murray, 2007; see also Murray et al. (2004, 2005), Thelen et al. (2012, 2014); Matusz et al. (2015a) for effects of prior multisensory contexts on sensory processing).”
Top-down control and early multisensory processes: chicken vs. egg (2015, background): “Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org March 2015 | Volume 9 | Article 17 | 2 Alsius et al., 2005, 2007; Thelen et al., 2012, 2014; Matusz et al., in press).”
Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination. (2015, unknown): “Consequently, we replicated our previous findings in visual object discrimination being incidentally affected by past multisensory encounters (Murray et al. 2004; 2005; Thelen et al. 2012).”
Identifying and Quantifying Multisensory Integration: A Tutorial Review (2014, background): “…a change in the neural generators underlying multisensory processing relative to unisensory processing, or changes in the timing that those generators are active, can represent distinct integrative processes (Altieri et al. 2013; Hauthal et al. 2013; Thelen et al. 2012; Murray et al. 2004, 2005).”