The Nature and Nurture of Giftedness: A New Framework for Understanding Gifted Education

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Talent Development as a Framework for Gifted Education (2015, background): “However, recent discussions (Dai, 2010, 2011; Dai & Chen, 2014; Subotnik, Olszewski-Kubilius, & Worrell, 2011) have used talent development to refer to a particular framework for viewing giftedness and the education of gifted children.”
Differentiated Instruction, Professional Development, and Teacher Efficacy (2014, background): “Dai (2010) argued that when curricular content and process fall outside of a student’s zone of proximal development (i.e., it is too easy or too hard), differentiation is called for.”
State of Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Survey of Empirical Studies Published During 1998—2010 (April) (2011, background): “…way we think about the nature of giftedness and talent, and the goals and practices of gifted education, we clearly see debates and tensions alluding to such a “paradigm shift” (e.g., Borland, 2003; Horowitz, Subotnik, & Matthews, 2009; Treffinger & Feldhusen, 1996; see Dai, 2010, for a review).”