Maximizing What Students Get Out of College: Testing a Learning Productivity Model
By Shouping Hu, George D. Kuh. 2003
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d0d7af77aead6cabaae1d6599cd1c14a81f2785
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- What Matters to Student Success: A Review of the Literature (2006, background): “1 The relationship between engagement and desired outcomes of college is well documented: (Anaya 1996; Astin 1984, 1993b; Banura et al. 2000; Berger and Milem 1999; Braxton, Sullivan, and Johnson 1997; Carini, Kuh, and Klein, in press; Chickering and Reisser 1993; Goodsell, Maher, and Tinto 1992; Hu”
- Does Involvement Really Matter? Indicators of College Student Success and Satisfaction (2013, methodology): “Although Inman and Pascarella (1998) found no significant difference in critical thinking scores for oncampus versus off-campus students, Pascarella and Terenzini report that there is “remarkably consistent evidence that students living on campus are more likely to persist and graduate than students”
- What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement (2009, background): “Some of these equivocal or disappointing findings may be due to differences in learning productivity on the part of the student (Hu & Kuh, 2003)—the ability to optimally convert the amount of time one spends on task into the desired outcome whether it be grades or something else of value.”
- Student engagement: students' and teachers' perceptions (2014, background): “However, this kind of data is defended by Hu and Kuh (2003), who convincingly show that student perception research is valid and valuable, providing that questions gauge items within respondents’ experience.”
- INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES AND STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (2006, methodology): “These are some of the most commonly used variables in the student engagement and development literature (e.g., Hu and Kuh, 2002, 2003a; e.g., Kuh and Hu, 2001; Toutkoushian and Smart, 2001).”
- Understanding How First-year Seminars Affect Persistence (2006, background): “For example, Hu and Kuh (2003b) found a statistically significant effect for selectivity on a dependent variable with a intraclass correlation of 3.3%, while Merlo et al. (2001) found statistically significant level 2 effects for a dependent variable with an intraclass correlation of only 0.4%.”
- How Sound Is NSSE?: Investigating the Psychometric Properties of NSSE at a Public, Research-Extensive Institution (2011, unknown): “…2008), leadership development (Pascarella, Seifert, & Blaich, 2008; Posner, 2004), identity development (Harper, Carini, Bridges, & Hayek, 2004; Hu & Kuh, 2003), moral development (Pascarella, Seifert, & Blaich, 2008), academic performance or GPA (Carini, Kuh, & Klein, 2006; Gordon et al.,…”
- Developing Social and Personal Competence in the First Year of College (2007, result): “This level of variance contributed by institution-level variables is, moreover, consistent with those reported in similar studies (Hu & Kuh, 2003; Umbach & Porter, 2002) In te rc ep t fo r so ci al a n d p er so n al c om p et en ce , B 0 2.”