Situated cognition and the wisdom in feelings: Cognitive tuning.

By Norbert Schwarz. 2002

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b9e6c0d35525824d94867575144bc62504b2cda

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation (2011, background): “And ‘‘cognitive tuning’’ theories tell us that individuals look to their emotions to provide them with information as they evaluate the world around them and decide how to act (Isbell, Ottati, and Burns 2006; Ottati, Terkildsen, and Hubbard 1997; Rahn 2000, Schwarz 2002; Schwarz and Clore 1983).”
The Nature and Role of Affect in Consumer Behavior (2008, background): “One possible explanation, also based on the aff ect-as-information hypothesis, is that sad moods signal to the individual that the situation is problematic and therefore requires a more vigilant form of processing, whereas good moods signal that the situation is benign and allows a more nonchalant f”
The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgment accuracy (2013, background): “For example, affect has been shown to influence individuals' depth of cognitive processing (Schwarz, 2002), as well as thinking style (Ashton-James, Maddux, Galinsky, & Chartrand, 2009).”
Detecting and constructing meaning in life events (2009, background): “…support the contention that the detection and construction of meaning in events fit into the larger framework of research on mood and cognition, which has identified positive affect with top-down processing and negative affect with bottom-up processing (Bless, 2001; Fiedler, 2001; Schwarz, 2002).”
Navigating Into the Future or Driven by the Past (2013, background): “…a view in which subcortical affective processes are integral with cognition (Pessoa, 2008) and serve to “attune” the individual intelligently and dynamically in response to a changing environment (Ortny, Clore, & Collins, 1988; Reynolds & Berridge, 2008; N. Schwartz, 2002; Schwartz & Clore, 2003).”
Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making (2004, background): “These effects can be conceptualized by assuming that human cognition is situated and adaptively tuned to meet the processing requirements of the situation, requirements that are signaled by immediate affective responses (see Schwarz, 2002).”
Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making (2011, background): “What comes to mind can be semantic content (e.g., Srull & Wyer, 1979), goals (e.g., Förster, Liberman, & Friedman, 2007), or procedures that tell people how to process information to make sense of experience (e.g., Oyserman & Sorensen, 2009; Schwarz, 2002, 2007; Wyer & Xu, 2010).”
Why and When Leaders’ Affective States Influence Employee Upward Voice (2017, background): “Research has shown that an individual often attunes his or her thought processes and behaviors to the information provided by his or her own affect in order to function and adapt to an environment effectively (Schwarz, 2002).”
Feeling Mixed, Ambivalent, and in Flux: The Social Functions of Emotional Complexity for Leaders (2017, background): “For instance, whereas negative emotions are associated with a narrow focus of attention (Schwarz, 2002) and positive emotions broaden individuals’ focus (Fredrickson, 2001), emotional complexity signals that the environment is atypical (Fong, 2006), thus drawing individuals’ attention to divergent…”
Accounting for the Joint Effects of the Servicescape and Service Exchange on Consumers’ Satisfaction Evaluations (2007, background): “Consequently, people are likely to ask themselves “how do I feel about it” when asked to assess their level of satisfaction with service encounters (e.g., Schwarz, 2002).”
Moody experts — How mood and expertise influence judgmental anchoring (2009, background): “This is also likely to be the case for indirect effects of mood on judgment via changes in information processing styles, which have been demonstrated to be quite flexible (Bless, Bohner, Schwarz & Strack, 1990; Schwarz, 2002).”
Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. (2006, background): “Considering the content of thoughts about the self separately from the feelings associated with these thoughts parallels work in social cognition (Schwarz, 1998, 2002).”
Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. (2011, background): “…of the mood-asinformation theoretical framework and its related research in psychology (e.g., Fiedler, 1988; Kaufmann, 2003; Martin & Stoner, 1996; Schwarz, 2002; Schwarz & Clore, 2003), George and Zhou (2007) advanced a “dual-tuning perspective” in arguing that both positive and negative moods…”
Emotional Intelligence in Undergraduate Accounting Students: Preliminary Assessment (2006, background): “It has been found that negative emotional states facilitate detail-oriented thinking while positive states are related to big picture analysis (Swartz, 2002).”
Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model (2011, background): “This finding is consistent with evidence that mood has an informational function (Schwarz, 2002), because it reflects the state of our environment (problematic vs. benign situation) and alerts us on situational requirements.”