Coh-Metrix: Capturing Linguistic Features of Cohesion
By Danielle S. McNamara, Max M. Louwerse, P. M. McCarthy, A. Graesser. 2010
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b12a4c69d00b6ed5ed36ff58a38d38815fc3be0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Danielle S. McNamara
- K. Kyle
- Dan Jurafsky
- Jiwei Li
- A. Graesser
- Jonna M. Kulikowich
- Randy G. Floyd
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Danielle S. McNamara
- K. Kyle
- Dan Jurafsky
- A. Graesser
- Yasuhiro Ozuru
- Randy G. Floyd
- S. D’Mello
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Danielle S. McNamara
- K. Kyle
- A. Graesser
- Yasuhiro Ozuru
- Randy G. Floyd
- Dan Jurafsky
- Roger Azevedo
Citations in the corpus
- Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers' prior knowledge (2011, background): “Thus, one possible interpretation for the emergence of comprehension difficulties around the fourth grade is that children lack sufficient prior knowledge to comprehend expository texts that are introduced during this period.”
- Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency (2010, methodology): “Thus, unlike McNamara et al. (2010), we do not rely solely on computational indices to model overall essay quality, but instead concentrate on the evaluation of human judgments of individual text features in relation to overall text quality.”
- Coh-Metrix (2011, background): “…that referential and causal cohesion both have a substantial impact on reading time and comprehension (Goldman et al., 1999; O’Brien et al., 1998; Zwaan & Radvansky, 1998), and also that Coh-Metrix is sufficiently sensitive to detect these particular cohesion manipulations (McNamara et al., 2010).”
- The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion (2015, methodology): “…has suggested that the use of local cohesion devices may have little to no relation to expert ratings of text quality (McNamara et al. 2013; McNamara et al. 2010a, b), and some cohesion research has even yielded negative correlations to writing quality (Crossley & McNamara, 2010, 2011,…”
- Neural Net Models for Open-Domain Discourse Coherence (2016, background): “Psychological models of discourse (Foltz et al., 1998; Foltz, 2007; McNamara et al., 2010) generalize lexical cohesion via LSA embeddings of sentences.”