Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency
By Scott Andrew Crossley, Danielle S. McNamara. 2010
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/974455abecd7b211a17147da147a81fd7dcaf07f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- K. Kyle
- Danielle S. McNamara
- A. Graesser
- Kathryn S. McCarthy
- Tom Salsbury
- P. M. McCarthy
- Tenaha O'Reilly
Citations in the corpus
- Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview (2020, result): “Additional studies by Crossley and McNamara (2010; 2011) reported similar findings in that local cohesive devices including those reported in McNamara et al. (2010) in addition to causal, spatial, temporal cohesion features either do not correlate with human ratings of text coherence or correlate…”
- The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion (2015, background): “TTR indices have demonstrated positive relations with measures of cohesion in previous studies (Crossley & McNamara, 2014; McCarthy & Jarvis, 2010), but generally they demonstrate negative relations with measures of text coherence (Crossley & McNamara, 2010; McNamara et al. 2010a, b).”