Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design

By Stephanie A. Goodwin, A. Gubin, Susan T. Fiske, V. Yzerbyt. 2000

385 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a9b2cd1792cc6c551c01f842e0a38ebdba6d927

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Adam D. Galinsky
2. Yaacov Trope
3. A. Guinote
4. Derek D. Rucker
5. Pamela K. Smith
6. Gerben A. van Kleef
7. J. Lammers
8. Bogdan Wojciszke

In Social Psychology

1. Gerben A. van Kleef
2. Adam D. Galinsky
3. Derek D. Rucker
4. A. S. R. Manstead
5. David Dubois
6. Naomi B Rothman
7. Pamela K. Smith
8. Dacher Keltner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Gerben A. van Kleef
2. Adam D. Galinsky
3. A. S. R. Manstead
4. Derek D. Rucker
5. Naomi B Rothman
6. Dacher Keltner
7. Pamela K. Smith
8. David Dubois

Citations in the corpus

• You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. (2006, methodology): “Considering the various motivations that powerful and powerless people may have (e.g., Goodwin et al., 2000), models developed to explain how people interact with others above and below them in a hierarchy may not necessarily apply to how people perceive and interact with all stimuli in their…”
• POWER INFLUENCES SELF-ESTEEM (2007, methodology): “The Power as Control model (Fiske, 1993, Goodwin et al., 2000 ) assumes that increased power leads to stereotyping (especially when perceiving subordinates) while decreased power leads to piece meal or individuated perceptions.”
• The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy (2011, background): “, 2008), and negative effects of power, such as increased stereotyping, reduced perspective taking, and increased risk-taking (e.g., Anderson & Galinsky, 2006; Galinsky et al., 2006; Goodwin et al., 2000).”
• Strike Three: Discrimination, Incentives, and Evaluation (2011, background): “Studies of cognitive behavior indicate that presenting the biased party with counter-examples of the stereotype of interest can reduce the severity and/or frequency of the biased behavior (Stephanie A. Goodwin et al, 2000; Irene V. Blair, 2002).”
• Behaviour variability and the Situated Focus Theory of Power (2007, background): “For example, although powerless individuals consistently attend to individuating information about other individuals (see Fiske & Dépret, 1996; Goodwin et al., 2000), this does not translate into more individuating social judgements (see Overbeck & Park, 2001, 2006; see also Vescio et al., 2003).”
• The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach. (2004, background): “…about another person (Erber & Fiske, 1984), rely more on stereotypes and less on individual attributes when forming impressions about others (Goodwin et al., 2000; Neuberg & Fiske, 1987), pay less attention to specific social stimuli (Snodgrass, 1985, 1992), and ask less diagnostic…”