Is Corporate Diversification Beneficial in Emerging Markets
By K. Lins, Henri Servaes. 2002
450 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a49ddd62be817c53dd84093d8687931a3314ed9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Thorsten Beck
- Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
- Mike W. Peng
- Ross Levine
- Geert Bekaert
- Stijn Claessens
- Vojislav Maksimovic
- Meghana Ayyagari
Citations in the corpus
- Creditor rights and corporate risk-taking (2009, unknown): “However, Lins and Servaes (2002) reject the theory on the benefits of internal capital markets.”
- The Benefits and Costs of Internal Markets: Evidence from Asia's Financial Crisis (2001, background): “Finally, East Asian corporations have a record of significant use of internal markets when compared to companies in the United States, as documented in Fauver et al. (1999) and Lins and Servaes (1999b).”
- Corporate Governance in Asia: A Survey (2002, unknown): “Lins and Servaes (2002) also study the effect of corporate diversification 88 ß International Review of Finance Ltd. 2003 on firm value, but find opposite effects.”
- Does Good Corporate Governance Include Employee Representation? Evidence from German Corporate Boards (2006, unknown): “See Lins and Servaes (2002) for a study of these effects in emerging markets and Denis and McConnell (2003) and LaPorta et al., (2000b) for a general overview of these issues.”
- Principal—Principal Conflict in the Governance of the Chinese Public Corporation (2008, background): “The latter, newer research stream, however, has mostly focused on aspects of ownership structure other than ownership concentration per se, such as insider ownership (Chang, 2003; Lins and Servaes, 2002) and the presence of large shareholders (Claessens et al., 2002).”
- Beyond institutional voids: Business groups, incomplete markets, and organizational form (2015, background): “…to growth opportunities also provide a potential answer to the interesting empirical observation in the business group literature that business group affiliates are more diversified than nongroup firms across many countries (Claessens et al., 1999; George and Kabir, 2012; Lins and Servaes, 2002).”
- Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Value: Evidence from Thailand (2001, background): “Lins and Servaes (2002) also study the effect of corporate diversification”
- Internal versus External Financing: An Optimal Contracting Approach (2003, background): “countries where capital markets are less developed. Lins and Servaes (2001) obtain a”
- Impact of state ownership and control mechanisms on the performance of group affiliated companies in China (2007, background): “Empirical studies in Asian corporations suggested that higher control rights would cause a serious agency problem when diversification increases because a parent company, as the dominant owner, could extend its control to large number of companies (Claessens, Djankov, & Lang, 2000; Lin & Servaes, 2”
- How Much of the Diversification Discount Can Be Explained by Poor Corporate Governance (2012, unknown): “Lins and Servaes (2002) find the diversification discount in their sample – including companies from seven Asian emerging markets – to be driven by firms with managerial ownership in the 10% to 30% range, where they expect managerial entrenchment to be highest.”
- Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites? (2007, unknown): “8 This may be related to Lins and Servaes (2002) who find that, diversification is associated with a discount for firms affiliated with diversified groups in emerging markets when their groups are already diversified and there is little justification for diversification at the firm level.”