Beyond institutional voids: Business groups, incomplete markets, and organizational form

By K. Manikandan, J. Ramachandran. 2015

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/814670fcabe524e65290c2878f9e04a20e41dbf9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Rose Narooz
2. J. Child
3. Phanish Puranam
4. Raveendra Chittoor
5. Jonathan P. Doh
6. P. Kale
7. Mona V. Makhija
8. Mike W. Peng

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Rose Narooz
2. A. Saka-Helmhout
3. J. Child
4. Phanish Puranam
5. Raveendra Chittoor
6. Jonathan P. Doh
7. S. Rodrigues
8. P. Kale

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Rose Narooz
2. J. Child
3. Phanish Puranam
4. Raveendra Chittoor
5. Jonathan P. Doh
6. P. Kale
7. Ulrich Kaiser
8. Christoph Grimpe

Citations in the corpus

• Networking responses to different levels of institutional void: a comparison of internationalizing SMEs in Egypt and the UK (2017, background): “…them to expand internationally. which institutional agencies approached these SMEs and offered them support. organized than the ‘business groups’ which in India have been an effective means for securing growth opportunities under conditions of institutional voids (Manikandan & Ramachandran, 2015).”
• Internalization advantage and subsidiary performance: The role of business group affiliation and host country characteristics (2019, unknown): “In reality, many business groups have persisted and thrived even when the institutional voids dissipated (Lee & Gaur, 2013; Manikandan & Ramachandran, 2015).”
• Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementarity perspective (2015, background): “In our view, the unique feature of BGs is not that their affiliates are legally distinct, as some have argued (e.g., Manikandan and Ramachandran, 2014), because control through common equity ownership stakes, often by a family, means that legal separateness may matter little in practice…”
• International business responses to institutional voids (2017, background): “…have tended to stress the importance of institutional voids related to formal institutions, including those pertaining to property rights protection and capital markets (Campbell & Lindberg, 1990; Khanna & Palepu, 2000; Inoue, Lazzarini, & Musacchio, 2013; Manikandan & Ramachandran, 2015).”