State Laws and Policies to Address Bullying in Schools

By Susan P. Limber, M. Small. 2003

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a2f8af4acdc9af652ad9a02c6b1aef9ab13cc62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Dianne L. Byers
2. M. Caltabiano
3. N. Caltabiano
4. Allen Ruby
5. Marilyn Anne Campbell
6. Dorothy Espelage
7. Sheri Bauman
8. E. Doolittle

In Education

1. Dorothy Espelage
2. David Finkelhor
3. Melissa K. Holt
4. Glenda Kaufman Kantor
5. Allen Ruby
6. Marilyn Anne Campbell
7. Sheri Bauman
8. E. Doolittle

In Social Psychology

1. Dorothy Espelage
2. David Finkelhor
3. Glenda Kaufman Kantor
4. Melissa K. Holt
5. Sheri Bauman
6. Dianne L. Byers
7. M. Caltabiano
8. N. Caltabiano

Citations in the corpus

• Teachers' Attitudes Towards Overt and Covert Bullying, and Perceived Efficacy to Intervene (2011, background): “It is apparent therefore, that a high priority has been conferred to physical bullying and as such quite a few schools amongst other policies have zero tolerance policies in place (Limber & Small, 2003).”
• Hidden Forms of Victimization in Elementary Students Involved in Bullying (2007, background): “…of School Psychologists, ISSN 0279-6015 2000; Nansel et al., 2001; Olweus, 1993a), states have responded by passing antibullying legislation (Limber & Small, 2003), and schools have implemented antibullying curricula (Committee for Children, 2001; Limber, Nation, Tracy, Melton, & Flerx,…”
• Parent/Child Concordance about Bullying Involvement and Family Characteristics Related to Bullying and Peer Victimization (2008, background): “Given evidence that bullying prevention programs can reduce bullying, some of these state statutes mention the benefit of implementing such programs within schools (Limber & Small, 2003).”
• Bullying in Schools: School Counselors’ Responses to Three Types of Bullying Incidents (2007, background): “(For recommendations of effective interventions, see the following: Fried & Fried, 1996; Hoover & Oliver, 1996; Limber & Small, 2003; Rigby, 2001; Shore, 2005; SommersFlanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 2004; Young, 2002.)”
• Efficacy of Schoolwide Programs to Promote Social and Character Development and Reduce Problem Behavior in Elementary School Children. Report from the Social and Character Development Research Program. NCER 2011-2001. (2010, background): “Both federal legislation (such as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001) and state legislation (Limber and Small 2003) have supported prevention and intervention programs, and the SACD Research Program sought to add to the research base underlying such efforts.”
• Cyber Bullying: An Old Problem in a New Guise? (2005, background): “Historically bullying has not been seen as a problem that needed attention, but rather has been accepted as a fundamental and normal part of childhood (Limber & Small, 2003).”
• Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims (2007, background): “tion the benefit of implementing bullying prevention programs (Limber and Snell, 2003), although given the increasing number of bullying prevention programs available it is often daunting for schools to select an effective one.”