Getting started: Launching a study in daily life.

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Developing and Testing a Dynamic Model of Workplace Incivility Change (2017, background): “…one focuses on dynamic withinperson relationships (as we do), a researcher’s emphasis is typically placed on sampling a sufficient number of time periods or occasions so that a study’s findings can “generalize to the population of experiences” as opposed to individuals (Conner & Lehman, 2012: 95).”
No Time Like the Present (2017, background): “A second methodological challenge is choosing the optimal time interval that suits the timescale of the process under investigation (Conner & Lehman, 2012; Dorman & Griffin, 2015).”
Ambulatory Assessment: New adventures in characterizing dynamic processes (2016, unknown): “These decisions depend on the questions that the project is intended to answer (EbnerPriemer & Sawitzki, 2007; Palmier-Claus et al., 2011), and guidelines exist for aiding researchers in the journey from hypotheses to AA protocol (Conner & Lehman, 2012).”
Lab And/Or Field? Measuring Personality Processes and Their Social Consequences (2015, background): “Researchers can chose between different assessment protocols (Conner et al., 2007; Conner & Lehman, 2012): Ambulatory assessments can occur in response to specific events (i.e. event-contingent sampling, e.g. after personal interactions), following a fixed schedule (i.e. interval-contingent…”