Lab And/Or Field? Measuring Personality Processes and Their Social Consequences

By C. Wrzus, Matthias R. Mehl. 2015

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/849c22b1cb3840d3b2af4e1b12b2413625f5542e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. M. Back
2. K. Geukes
3. Maarten H. W. van Zalk
4. M. Hennecke
5. B. Roberts
6. U. Orth
7. Maike Luhmann
8. Matthias Ziegler

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. Back
2. W. Bleidorn
3. C. Kandler
4. K. Geukes
5. Johannes Zimmermann
6. Maarten H. W. van Zalk
7. Christopher J. Hopwood
8. Jaap J. A. Denissen

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Back
2. W. Bleidorn
3. C. Kandler
4. K. Horstmann
5. Christopher J. Hopwood
6. Johannes Zimmermann
7. K. Geukes
8. P. Hill

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding personality development (2018, methodology): “…techniques provide an incredibly rich endeavor for future research on personality development—at the same time, however, it is technically, analytically, and ethically challenging (see Geukes, van Zalk, & Back, in press; Harari et al., in press; Wrzus & Mehl, 2015; for methodological overviews).”
• Longitudinal Experience–Wide Association Studies—A Framework for Studying Personality Change (2020, background): “Second, the field lacks validated instruments that are explicitly tailored to the assessment of personality states (Geukes et al., 2017; Wrzus & Mehl, 2015; Zimmermann et al., 2019).”
• Assessing Personality States: What to Consider when Constructing Personality State Measures (2020, methodology): “…personality theories suggest that personality can be described using a number of entities that all have a unique stable component, personality traits, and also variable aspects, personality states, that fluctuate from moment to moment (Baumert et al., 2017; Funder, 2001; Wrzus & Mehl, 2015).”
• Personality trait stability and change (2021, background): “A viable strategy to increase the frequency of assessments during such periods is the inclusion of measurement burst periods into longitudinal designs (Wrzus & Mehl, 2015).”
• Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders (2018, background): “…need to be developed that can both distinguish between the different variables in the interpersonal situation and which sample goals, feelings, and behaviours at the timescale implied by the formulations in this paper (Wright & Hopwood, 2016; Wright & Zimmermann, in press; Wrzus & Mehl, 2015).”