Morphological priming without morphological relationship
By Catherine-Marie Longtin, Juan Segui, Pierre A. Hallé. 2003
353 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87490ac31efa6a89a18032a7dddbf46fc782fa87
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Kathleen Rastle
- Jonathan Grainger
- Matthew H. Davis
- Colin J. Davis
- Minh Nguyen-Hoan
- Marcus Taft
- Max Coltheart
- Kevin Diependaele
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Kathleen Rastle
- Jonathan Grainger
- Colin J. Davis
- Matthew H. Davis
- Minh Nguyen-Hoan
- Marcus Taft
- Max Coltheart
- Kevin Diependaele
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Kathleen Rastle
- Matthew H. Davis
- Minh Nguyen-Hoan
- Marcus Taft
- Colin J. Davis
- Jonathan Grainger
- Fanny Meunier
- Samantha F. McCormick
Citations in the corpus
- Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic (2005, result): “This, however, seems inconsistent with recent masked priming data showing equivalent priming among semantically transparent (eg, driver/DRIVE) and semantically opaque forms (eg, corner/CORN) in morphologically less rich languages such as English (Feldman & Soltano, 1999 ; Rastle et al, 2000 ), and”
- Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing (2005, methodology): “Indeed, when an auditory or unmasked visual prime is used, a priming eVect is observed only for morphologically related words that are also semantically related: A semantically transparent word like clochette primes cloche, but an opaque word like vignette does not prime vigne (Feldman & Soltano, 19”
- A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity (2009, background): “These results suggest that visual word recognition involves a presemantic processing stage where anything that looks complex is decomposed on the basis of orthographic properties alone (Longtin et al., 2003; Rastle et al., 2004).”
- Visual Word Recognition (2007, neutral): “In these circumstances, robust facilitation of the magnitude typically obtained by identity primes is instead observed (Longtin et al., 2003; Rastle and Davis, 2003; Rastle et al., 2004).”
- Productivity and priming: Morphemic decomposition in Arabic (2011, neutral): “To do this, we used the masked priming task (Forster & Davis, 1984; though see Norris & Kinoshita, 2008 ), which, as indicated above, has been used extensively to probe early stages in the recognition of visually presented morphologically complex words in Arabic and Hebrew as well as in many Indo-E”
- Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing (2007, background): “In this cross-modal priming experiment, we wanted to see if a priming effect could be obtained and if it was comparable to the priming effect observed for existing derived words (e.g. Longtin et al., 2003).”
- Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition (2005, methodology): “In accordance with Longtin et al. (2003) all primes were words.”
- Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography (2008, background): “Key studies on this topic were reported by Longtin et al. (2003) and by Rastle, Davis, and New (2004).”
- The spatial coding model of visual word identification. (2010, methodology): “Indeed, as is shown in the Appendix, given an appropriate parameter choice, the original McClelland and Rumelhart (1981) model can be specified as a special case of the present model (thus, although I do not consider Reicher-Wheeler data here, there is at least one parameterisation of the model that”
- ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes (2010, background): “This is the general interpretation of the fact that brothel does not prime broth, while corner primes corn (e.g., Longtin et al., 2003; Marslen-Wilson et al., 2008; Rastle & Davis, 2008; Rastle et al., 2004), and we have endorsed this view in the present work.”
- A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon (2010, methodology): “The non-affixed items that have been used in the previous masked priming studies (e.g., Diependaele et al., 2005; Lavric et al., 2007; Longtin et al., 2003; MarslenWilson et al., 2008; McCormick et al., 2008; Rastle et al., 2004) have included a mixture of cases where the target is the BOSS of the…”
- Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition (2011, background): “The masked priming studies that have led to the revival of this “blind decomposition” framework in the last decade, all showed statistically equivalent priming effects with transparent and opaque items (e.g., Longtin et al., 2003; Rastle et al., 2004).”
- Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction (2008, background): “Finally, the possible role of morphemes as functional sublexical orthographic representations (see Taft & Forster, 1976 , for an early proposal) has been recently revived by the discovery that pseudo-complex words such as ‘corner’ (where the ‘er’ does not function as a suffix as in ‘farmer’) may we”
- Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition (2008, methodology): “These data bolster the case for a form of morphological decomposition that operates in the early stages of English visual word processing and that is insensitive to semantic information (e.g., Longtin et al., 2003; Longtin & Meunier, 2005; Rastle & Davis, 2003; Rastle et al., 2000, 2004).”