Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition
By Samantha F. McCormick, Kathleen Rastle, Matthew H. Davis. 2008
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0e4f778d1724414e9a43d3a3184c2dce1ebd328
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Max Coltheart
- L. Nickels
- Davide Crepaldi
- Kathleen Rastle
- Matthew H. Davis
- Jonathan Grainger
- Johannes C. Ziegler
- Colin J. Davis
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Max Coltheart
- Kathleen Rastle
- L. Nickels
- Davide Crepaldi
- Matthew H. Davis
- Johannes C. Ziegler
- D. Share
- Jonathan Grainger
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography (2008, background): “For instance, would morpheme recognition in SOLAR be disrupted by orthographic changes in {stem} {suffix} combinations like ‘metallic’, ‘writer’, or ‘adorable’ even though these do not appear to disrupt human participants (cf. McCormick et al., 2008)?”
- ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes (2010, methodology): “…morpho-orthographic representations are able to accommodate for slight modifications of the stem in derived forms (e.g., adorable–adore, dropper–drop; McCormick et al., 2008) also guarantees that the system is able to capture the relationship between allomorphic derived words (e.g., sizable) and…”