Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing

By Fanny Meunier, Catherine-Marie Longtin. 2007

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/200e1be9749e4c2cc04143e36f6f197c4c8a2675

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Kathleen Rastle
2. Matthew H. Davis
3. Samantha F. McCormick
4. Max Coltheart
5. L. Nickels
6. Davide Crepaldi
7. Jonathan Grainger

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Kathleen Rastle
2. Matthew H. Davis
3. Samantha F. McCormick
4. Max Coltheart
5. L. Nickels
6. Davide Crepaldi
7. Jonathan Grainger

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Kathleen Rastle
2. Matthew H. Davis
3. Samantha F. McCormick

Citations in the corpus

• Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition (2008, background): “…perspective on decomposition has since been reported in a variety of tasks including cross-modal priming (e.g., Longtin, Segui, & Hallé, 2003; Meunier & Longtin, 2007), visual priming with fully visible primes (e.g., Rastle et al., 2000), and unprimed lexical decision (e.g., Ford,…”
• Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography (2008, background): “Similarly, while the syntactic legality of morphologically structured pseudowords has no influence on masked priming effects (Longtin & Meunier, 2005), it does have an impact on the magnitude of cross-modal priming effects (Meunier & Longtin, 2007).”