Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition (2008, background): “These data bolster the case for a form of morphological decomposition that operates in the early stages of English visual word processing and that is insensitive to semantic information (e.g., Longtin et al., 2003; Longtin & Meunier, 2005; Rastle & Davis, 2003; Rastle et al., 2000, 2004).”
Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition (2011, background): “Further evidence for this view comes from the observation that newly constructed (i.e., unfamiliar) suffixed forms (e.g., cornly) elicit facilitation similar to that of familiar transparent primes, regardless of their interpretability (Longtin & Meunier, 2005, but see !"”
Visual Word Recognition (2007, unknown): “Furthermore, there is no effect of the lexicality of the prime on the magnitude of priming (Longtin and Meunier, 2005).”
Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing (2007, methodology): “For more details see the Materials of Experiment 1 in Longtin and Meunier (2005).”
Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography (2008, background): “The evidence for this locus is based on masked priming studies conducted by Longtin and Meunier (2005) investigating the decomposition of morphologically structured French pseudowords.”