Constructing grounded theory : a practical guide through qualitative analysis

By Kathy Charmaz. 2006

13,873 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/870dd95840efea64c266f72f2497a50905f5f9c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems (2009, methodology): “Theoretical memos (Strauss, 1987; Charmaz, 2006) are a further aid to iterative conceptualization, as the writing of a memo creates a formal space in which the researcher can reﬂect on the emerging theory.”
Food literacy competencies: A conceptual framework for youth transitioning to adulthood (2018, unknown): “…emer‐ gent themes using a constant comparison method within each of the 3 domains, meaning codes emerged from the data and were not pre‐ determined (Charmaz, 2006 Qualitative analysis: Used constructivist grounded theory methods to develop emergent themes from which broad and specific…”
Let's Dance! Elastic Coordination in Creative Group Work: A Qualitative Study of Modern Dancers (2014, methodology): “Given our interest in elaborating theory on coordination in creative group work, we conducted an inductive, qualitative study using grounded theory approaches (Charmaz, 2006; Strauss & Corbin, 1990).”
"It's Just Nice Having a Real Teacher": Student Perceptions of Online versus Face-to-Face Instruction (2015, methodology): “As suggested by Charmaz (2006) and Esterberg (2002), analysis began with a line-by-line reading of students’ explanations for their preference, noting open and in vivo codes in spreadsheet columns next to the explanations.”
Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model (2013, background): “Then, we engaged in intensive and carefully review of all collected data sources, where the initial coding (Charmaz, 2006) resulted in numerous concepts relating to categories such as third-party developers, SDK, API, platform governance, developers’ community and iPhone ecosystem.”
Ongoing and Online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying (2009, methodology): “Using focused coding and a constant comparative method (Charmaz, 2006; Glaser & Strauss, 1967), first-level codes were further refined and organized into categories.”
Assessing Resilience Across Cultures Using Mixed Methods: Construction of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure (2011, methodology): “Analysis of the qualitative data were guided by Glaser and Strauss’s (1967; Strauss & Corbin, 1990) grounded theory approach, together with constructionist advances (Charmaz, 2006; Clarke, 2005).”
Conservation Volunteers' Connection to Nature (2009, unknown): “We used a modifi ed Dillman (2000) technique for developing the questionnaire and interacting with respondents and analyzed quantitative data with SPSS 15 software and qualitative data with Atlas. ti software using the constant comparison method ( Charmaz, 2006 ).”
Learning Outcomes and Students' Perceptions of Online Writing: Simultaneous Implementation of a Forum, Blog, and Wiki in an EFL Blended Learning Setting. (2010, methodology): “We relied on the grounded theory approach to generate a hypothesis from specifics via a series of coding processes (Glaser and Strauss, 1967; Strauss and Corbin, 1990; Charmaz, 2006). For online writing analyses, following the research methodology by Kol and Schcolnik (2008), we used the text analys”
An Examination of the Sufficiency of Small Qualitative Samples (2018, methodology): “Once all interviews were conducted, transcripts resulting from the interviews were analyzed using techniques drawn from grounded theory and described by Charmaz (2006).”
Iterative categorization (IC): a systematic technique for analysing qualitative data (2016, background): “Some authors recommend coding initially into multiple exploratory ‘open’ codes, then collapsing these into fewer more focused codes, and then merging the more focused codes into a small number of broader conceptual codes [25,26].”
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2016, methodology): “During data collection, the researcher compares sequentially added events until exhaustive saturation of properties of categories and of relations among them is obtained (Charmaz, 2006).”