A True Test: Toward More Authentic and Equitable Assessment

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An Exemplar for Teaching and Learning Qualitative Research (2012, background): “More specifically, performance assessment tasks should involve important, meaningful, interesting, and stimulating performances that are linked to desired real-life student outcomes (Fuchs, 1995; Wiggins, 1989; Worthen, 1993).”
Defining Authentic Classroom Assessment. (2012, methodology): “…1994 33 Ratcliff, 2001 34 Reed, 1993 35 Schnitzer, 1993 36 Spinelli, 1998 37 Stripling, 1993 38 Suen, 1997 39 Torrance, 1993 40 Wiggins, 1989a 41 Wiggins, 1989b 42 Wiggins, 1990 43 Wiggins, 1992 44 Wiggins, 1993 45 Wiggins, 1996 46 Wiggins, 2006 47 Williams, 2004 * Shaded areas indicated…”
Assessment Techniques and Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills (2016, background): “Whereas, many researchers (Shepard, 1989; Wiggins, 1989, 1993; Paul & Nosich, 1992) proposed performance based assessment as a tool to measure higherorder thinking skills.”
Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data (2020, background): “…students in real-world, complex tasks linked to professional practice is good for learning (Gulikers et al., 2004; J. A. Herrington & Herrington, 2006; Newmann & Archbald, 1992; Wiggins, 2011) our research challenges the belief that, in itself, authentic assessment will assure academic integrity.”