Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory.

By Robert J. Hartsuiker, Herman H. J. Kolk. 2001

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue (2004, background): “All models assume that speakers monitor their own output, so that, for instance, they are able to interrupt their productions in order to change what they say (Hartsuiker & Kolk 2001; Levelt 1983; 1989).”
Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. (2008, background): “The existence of this inner loop gives a good account of our ability to monitor our planned speech for errors ( Hartsuiker & Kolk, 2001; Postma, 2000; Roelofs, 2004; Slevc & Ferreira, 2006).”
Becoming syntactic. (2006, result): “These results support the view that the sequencing system acquires structural representations that serve both comprehension and production (e.g., Bock, 1995; Hartsuiker & Kolk, 2001; Kempen & Harbusch, 2002; MacDonald, 1999; MacKay, 1987; Vigliocco & Hartsuiker, 2002).”
Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production (2005, background): “As in other domains of speech production, we expect that speakers monitor their output to ensure that what they have said will not lead to mistaken interpretations (e.g., Hartsuiker & Kolk, 2001; Levelt, 1983; Postma, 2000; Schegloff, Jefferson, & Sacks, 1977).”
Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion (2003, unknown): “Such flexibility at the articulatory level might occur if the speech monitoring system can access the amount of information stored in the buffer, which is compatible with current theories of speech monitoring (e.g., Hartsuiker & Kolk, 2001; Postma, 2000).”
Impact of Working Memory Constraints on Speech Monitoring in Healthy Children (2013, background): “If, before articulation, an error is determined based on the linguistic rules of the language spoken, the speaker may require time to formulate the repair, causing a pause in speech or may repeat sections of a word as an attempt to restart (Hartsuiker & Kolk, 2001; Postma & Kolk, 1992).”