Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

By Gary M. Oppenheim, Gary S. Dell. 2008

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Cognitive Science & Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Computational neuroanatomy of speech production (2012, background): “Recent work has found that errors do occur and can be detected in internally generated speech 35 .”
Discrepancy between inner and overt speech: Implications for post-stroke aphasia and normal language processing (2011, background): “Oppenheim and Dell ( 2008 ) suggest that inner speech is “phonetically impoverished” in comparison to overt speech, because inner speech lacks some of the phonetic components present in overt speech, or because the comprehension system fails to detect the full range of phonetic features of the produ”
Auditory imagery: empirical findings. (2010, background): “Oppenheim and Dell (2008) created four-word sequences in which the last two words of each sequence had been previously shown to lead to an increased probability of speech errors.”
Inner Speech during Silent Reading Reflects the Reader's Regional Accent (2011, background): “However, some of the evidence from tongue twister studies [30] seems to suggest that inner speech is impoverished at the featural level, compared to overt speech (but see [31]).”
Sensorimotor Integration in Speech Processing: Computational Basis and Neural Organization (2011, unknown): “…(Decety and Michel, 1989), and research on imagined speech suggests that it shares properties with real speech, for example subjects report inner ''slips of the tongue'' that show a lexical bias (slips tend to form words rather than nonwords) just as in overt speech (Oppenheim and Dell, 2008).”
Edinburgh Research Explorer Investigating the inner speech of people who stutter: Evidence for (and against) the Covert Repair Hypothesis. (unknown): “2 In the study we used a modified version of a tonguetwister paradigm, originally developed by Oppenheim and Dell (2008) to investigate the effects of phoneme similarity on errors in inner speech.”
Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech (2010, unknown): “In our experiment, we investigated the question that concerned Oppenheim and Dell (2008) and Brocklehurst and Corley (2009): Are the slips that occur in inner speech sensitive to articulatory similarity? The previous research on this question has contrasted inner speech with overt speech, but inner ”
How do forward models work? And why would you want them? (2013, unknown): “For example, Paus et al. (1996) found activation (dependent on the rate of speech) of regions associated with speech perception when people whispered but could not hear their own speech.”