Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Beyond common and privileged: Gradient representations of common ground in real-time language use (2012, background): “These gradient representations may be represented, as Horton and Gerrig (2005a, 2005b) have argued, as associations in memory between discourse partners and discourse referents.”
Learning to order words: A connectionist model of heavy NP shift and accessibility effects in Japanese and English (2009, background): “A third possible way that comprehension could influence production would be if speakers were consciously or unconsciously adapting their utterances to make them easier for their listeners to understand (Clark, 1996; Horton & Gerrig, 2005).”
Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes (2008, background): “That is, speakers are able to assess who their audience is both in terms of shared personal experience (including prior conversation), and assumptions about community membership (Horton & Gerrig, 2005; see Clark, 1996, for a discussion).”
Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication (2006, background): “Horton and Gerrig (2005) discussed a number of examples of this kind taken from corpora of telephone conversations.”