Gary M. Oppenheim

Cognitive Neuroscience · 2008–2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Cognitive Neuroscience — 11 citations into it; #4,355 of 10,852 by trust here, #5,990 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 11 citations into it; #5,826 of 9,731 by trust here, #7,398 by citations
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 10 citations into it
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 9 citations into it; #446 of 582 by trust here, #429 by citations
• Linguistics — 7 citations into it

Whom Gary M. Oppenheim trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Robert J. Hartsuiker
2. Sieb G. Nooteboom
3. Alan Baddeley
4. Judith M. Ford
5. Willem J. M. Levelt

Who trusts Gary M. Oppenheim overall

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Timothy Hubbard
3. Gregory Hickok
4. Charles Fernyhough
5. Xing Tian
6. Jeffrey S. Bowers
7. J. V. Van Raalte

Papers from Gary M. Oppenheim's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Gary M. Oppenheim trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Monitoring the Time Course of Phonological Encoding
2. Working memory
3. Electrophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia during talking and thinking.
4. Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory.
5. Psychology As The Behaviorist Views It
6. Lexical bias revisited: Detecting, rejecting and repairing speech errors in inner speech
7. Word length and the structure of short-term memory
8. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology
9. A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review)
10. The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn’t fly: Related beply to Baars et al. (1975) ☆

Their papers

• Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech (2010) — 141 citations
• Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. (2008) — 180 citations