Groupwork as a form of assessment: common problems and recommended solutions

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does the use of summative peer assessment in collaborative group work inhibit good judgement? (2018, background): “Many recommendations and strategies for developing self-assessment skills (Boud 1989) and overcoming problems associated with collaborative group work (Davies 2009) could be adapted for both self and peer assessment scenarios.”
Connecting the dots: social network structure, conflict, and group cognitive complexity (2012, methodology): “While the individual gains of collaborative and cooperative learning are well investigated (Davies 2009; Lizzio and Wilson 2006; Springer et al. 1999), the effects of collaborative learning at the group level of analysis have not been extensively addressed (Haggis 2009).”
Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests (2019, background): “Forming small groups and offering a sufficiently complex task that requires dialogue and discussion can help promote this (Davies, 2009).”