Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility

By S. Waddock. 2008

592 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84527e5f8720d0ba388a0fd936c2fa4ac18eea38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Role of Normative CSR‐Promoting Institutions in Stimulating CSR Disclosures in Developing Countries (2018, background): “Further to this, such forums and networks appear to influence companies to assume greater responsibility, transparency, accountability and better disclosure practices (Waddock, 2008; Steurer, 2010).”
Mind the Gap: The Interplay Between External and Internal Actions in the Case of Corporate Social Responsibility (2015, background): “4 In recent years, firms have undertaken an increasing number of voluntary environmental, social, and corporate governance initiatives—often referred to collectively as “corporate social responsibility” (CSR) actions (Carroll, 1979; Waddock & Graves, 1997; Hillman & Keim, 2001)—in response to growin”
How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative (2015, background): “The recent proliferation of international sustainability standards has caused a certain degree of confusion, but the GRI is emerging as a dominant player in this field (Waddock, 2008).”
Voluntary Governance Mechanisms in Global Supply Chains: Beyond CSR to a Stakeholder Utility Perspective (2016, background): “Voluntary governance mechanisms are one aspect of a firm's CSR infrastructure (Waddock, 2008).”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance (2012, background): “In fact, the emergence of new CSR-related institutions at the global level now shapes the practices and policies of corporations—multinational and local alike (Waddock, 2008).”
Managing Legitimacy in Complex and Heterogeneous Environments: Sustainable Development in a Globalized World (2013, unknown): “…from 15/50 primary stakeholders, such as company owners, employees, customers, or suppliers, and from secondary stakeholders, such as NGOs or activists, local communities, or governments (Waddock et al., 2002), as well as with pressures from a variety of international institutions (Waddock, 2008).”
The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World – A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy (2011, unknown): “Waddock (2008), for instance, discusses the emerging global institutional infrastructure on CSR.”
How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review (2017, background): “In practice, a new institutional infrastructure of CSR has emerged, with a multitude of organizations across the public, corporate, and civil society sectors playing a role in its development (Waddock, 2008).”
Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives (2012, background): “…e.g. Dahan, Doh, & Guay, 2006; Fransen & Kolk, 2007; Gilbert & Rasche, 2008; Scherer & Palazzo, 2011; Teegen, Doh, & Vachani, 2004; Vogel, 2010; Waddock, 2008), connecting the latter to the debate on global governance in political science (Held & McGrew, 2002; Koenig-Archibugi, 2004; Risse,…”
The Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards (2013, unknown): “Waddock’s classification is based on the distinction between ‘‘state/ government, market/business and civil society categories’’ (Waddock 2008, p. 87) and her thorough review provides us with up-to-date tables with the most relevant international initiatives in the CSR arena, including normative…”