Information technology and economic performance

By Jason L. Dedrick, Vijay Gurbaxani, Kenneth L. Kraemer. ACM Computing Surveys, 2003

1,047 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Media Technology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8422ac564691ccee75e4987194b2d41616114b72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Media Technology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Information Technology and Firm Profitability: Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence (2012, background): “Annual Averages ($ millions per employee) 1 lists some representative studies and is not meant to be exhaustive (for more detailed review of the literature on business value of IT, see Dedrick et al. 2003; Kohli and Devaraj 2003; Kohli and Grover 2008; Melville et al. 2004).”
Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there (2013, methodology): “According to Wan et al (2007) and Dedrick et al (2003), the productivity paradox has been resolved at firm level due to more sophisticated and refined data sources, a shift in the level of analysis towards the firm level, and a refocus on the management of IS.”
E-commerce trends and impacts across Europe (2015, background): “…(ICT) – as previously expressed by Solow (1987), for instance – have been replaced by strong empirical evidence that ICT is indeed an important factor of economic growth and firm performance (Dedrick, Gurbaxani, and Kraemer, 2003; Van Reenen et al., 2010; Cardona, Kretschmer, and Strobel, 2013).”
When more is too much: Operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity (2010, background): “They have cited inadequate sample size, incomplete data, confounding factors, lag effects, unsophisticated analysis, and difficulty in achieving measurement accuracy as reasons why the link between IT investments and productivity was not found (Brynjolfsson & Yang, 1996; Dendrick et al., 2003).”
IT capabilities and firm performance: A contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability type (2009, result): “For example, while a number of studies [8,33] have shown that IT spending is associated with increased firm output—thus dispelling the so-called “productivity paradox” at the firm level— empirical studies examining the contemporaneous relationship between IT spending and measures of financial perfor”
Telecommunications Reform, Internet Use and Mobile Phone Adoption in the Developing World (2009, methodology): “Similarly, Kalathil and Boas (2003) find that authoritarian regimes may significantly develop their digital communication infrastructure specifically as a means of extending the reach of the state (Chase & Mulvenon, 2002; Diebert, 2008). Finally, Li, Qiang, Zhen-Wei, and Colin (2005) argue that tele”
Artificial Intelligence as Augmenting Automation: Implications for Employment (2020, background): “When technology fosters productivity, the replacement or displacement of labor follows suit from those gains (Dedrick et al, 2003; Dewan and Min, 1997).”
Information Technology Payoff in E-Business Environments: An International Perspective on Value Creation of E-Business in the Financial Services Industry (2004, background): “[17] have pointed out opportunities for future IT payoffs research.”
Discourses on ICT and Development (2010, background): “It is acknowledged that ICT needs to be accompanied by organizational restructuring to deliver productivity gains (Dedrick et al., 2003; Draca et al., 2007).”
ICT Adoption in Small and Medium Enterprises: an Empirical Evidence of Service Sectors in Malaysia (2009, background): “Some empirical studies by Bartelsman and Doms (2000), Brynjolfsson and Yang (1996), Dedrick et al. (2003), Kohli and Devaraj (2003) and Melville et al. (2004) confirms the positive effect of information and communication”
Does Knowledge Management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance (2012, background): “…it has been argued that information technology has its greatest impact in the production process through enabling coordination of activity (Dedrick et al., 2003; Tanriverdi, 2005), thereby allowing for knowledge transfer and integration within and across organizational boundaries and…”