Guest Editors' Introduction Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications*

By Abagail McWilliams, Donald S. Siegel, Patrick M. Wright. 2006

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8312e4d3ee5c570d858b072c13abda180118f46a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance and the role of innovation: evidence from German listed firms (2013, background): “2011), which includes its environmental and social concerns (Carroll 1999; McWilliams et al. 2006).”
Corporate social responsibility and capital allocation efficiency (2017, unknown): “…Friedman's (1970) well-known argument that “the only social responsibility of corporations is to make money”, argues that CSR is a manifestation of agency problems (e.g., Aupperle et al., 1985; Bénabou and Tirole, 2010; Krüger, 2015; McWilliams et al., 2006) and often is costly for shareholders.”
Socially Responsible Firms and Endogenous Choice of Strategic Incentives (2012, unknown): “Early studies were inconclusive (McWilliams et al. 2006), although newer results seem to suggest that fine-grained methods yield more pronounced (positive) links between a proper definition of CSP and CFP (e.g. Carroll and Shabana 2010, Surroca et al. 2010, Brammer and Millington 2008, Godfrey et…”
Do Investors Value a Firm’s Commitment to Social Activities? (2013, unknown): “…presence of mediator/ moderator variables such as a firm’s investments in intangible assets (Barnett 2007; McWilliams and Siegel 2000, 2001; McWilliams et al. 2006; Hull and Rothenberg 2008; Surroca et al. 2010; Guiral 2012; Blanco et al. 2012).2 The aim of this paper is to extend…”
The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors (2010, unknown): “In that regard, there is extensive evidence that CSR efforts often translate into improvements in a firm‟s financial performance (see, among others, McWilliams et al., 2006; Margolis and Walsh, 2003; Roman et al., 1999; Griffin and Mahon, 1997; Pava and Krausz, 1995; Wood and Jones, 1995; Orlitzky…”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Role of Context in International Settings (2013, background): “…CSR has many definitions and connotations: from ‘business ethics or philanthropy or environmental policy’, ‘corporate social performance and corporate citizenship’ (McWilliams et al. 2006, p. 8; Secchi 2007; Windsor 2006) and ‘social accounting or corporate accountability’ (Crowther 2000).”
Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis (2019, methodology): “First, we read review articles (Aguinis and Glavas, 2012; McWilliams et al., 2006) and prior meta-analyses (Margolis et al.”
Evolutionary Competition in a Mixed Market with Socially Concerned Firms (2014, unknown): “Empirical studies investigating the link between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance do not show clear-cut results (McWilliams et al., 2006; McWilliams and Siegel, 2000), although newer studies show a tendency towards a positive relation under certain conditions (e.g.…”
Making sense of Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring organizational processes and strategies (2010, background): “…views on CSR that assume a ‘triple bottom line’ connection between the economic, environmental and social responsibilities of business as expressed by the three P’s of profit, people and planet (Carroll, 1979; Elkington, 1999; Garriga and Melé, 2004; Mcwilliams et al., 2006; Tellegen, 2006).”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk (2014, unknown): “Other studies, however, take an agency-cost perspective and express a negative view on managerial motivations for pursuing CSR (e.g., Jensen and Meckling, 1976; Friedman, 1970; Carroll, 1979; McWilliams et al., 2006).”
Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Performance in Spanish Smes: Empirical Evidence from a Stakeholders’ Perspective * (2016, background): “Different authors have noted that the appearance of empirical discrepancies about the sign identified for the CSR-firm performance link might be due to the omission of certain confounding variables (McWilliams et al., 2006; Orlitzky, 2008).”