DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy
By K. Forster, J. C. Forster. Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers, 2003
2,753 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Hardware and Architecture
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82bceb90bec587cdee3f6be88cb25dd1cf5d78af
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Hardware and Architecture
- Rachel Hayes-Harb
- Albert Gatt
- Anya Belz
- Matthew H. Davis
- Albert Costa
- Manuel Perea
- David M. Amodio
- Nicolas Dumay
Citations in the corpus
- Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: evidence from the ANT task. (2008, methodology): “Stimuli were presented via DMDX ( Forster & Forster, 2003 ), a Win 32 program, on an IBM-compatible personal computer running XP (For an illustration, see Fig. 1).”
- Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic (2005, methodology): “Timing, stimulus display, and data collection were controlled by three laptop PCs running the DMDX package so that up to three participants could be tested simultaneously (Forster & Forster, 2003).”
- On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production (2006, positive): “The experiment was controlled by the software DmDX (Forster & Forster, 2003).”
- The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics (2012, methodology): “Presentation of the stimuli and recording of response times were controlled by a Windows computer running DMDX (Forster & Forster, 2003).”
- PyGaze: An open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments (2014, background): “Creating experiments has rapidly become easier over the past few years, especially with the introduction of graphical experiment builders (GEBs) (Forster & Forster, 2003; Mathôt, Schreij, & Theeuwes, 2012; Peirce, 2007; Schneider, 1988; Stahl, 2006).”
- Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters (2004, methodology): “The intertrial interval was 523 ms. Stimulus presentation and response collection were controlled by DMDX and TimeDX software Version 3.02 ( Forster & Forster, 2003 ).”
- The TUNA-REG Challenge 2009: Overview and Evaluation Results (2009, methodology): “Stimulus presentation was carried out using DMDX , a Win-32 software package for psycholinguistic experiments involving time measurements (Forster and Forster, 2003).”
- Reading Difficulties in Adult Deaf Readers of French: Phonological Codes, Not Guilty! (2012, methodology): “We presented the task using DMDX software (Forster & Forster, 2003) on a Pentium 4 PC with a 22-in. iiyama CRT monitor at a refresh rate of 150 Hz.”
- Intergroup anxiety effects on the control of racial stereotypes: A psychoneuroendocrine analysis☆ (2009, methodology): “Stimuli and instructions for the weapons identification task were adapted from Payne (2001) and presented using DMDX software ( Forster & Forster, 2003 ).”
- Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency (2010, methodology): “Items were presented to participants on a computer monitor using DMDX experimental software (Forster & Forster, 2003).”
- The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming (2004, methodology): “Stimuli were presented randomly within categories, using the DMDX package developed at the University of Arizona by J.C. Forster (Forster & Forster, 2003), with the only constraint that the ‘‘practice’’ exemplars preceded the critical items.”
- Learning and Consolidation of Novel Spoken Words (2009, methodology): “Auditory stimuli were presented over highquality headphones (Resonance Technology, Commander XG system) using DMDX software (Forster & Forster, 2003).”
- Automatic activation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming (2008, methodology): “The 74 trials (with 44 word targets and 30 nonword targets) were then presented in a different random order for each participant using DMDX display software (Forster & Forster, 2003).”
- The effect of cognitive load in emotional attention and trait anxiety: An eye movement study (2012, methodology): “The presentation of the stimuli was controlled by the DMDX program (Forster & Forster, 2003 ), which ensures millisecond timing accuracy.”
- Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures (2012, methodology): “The experiment was programmed using DMDX (Forster & Forster, 2003).”
- Asymmetric lexical access and fuzzy lexical representations in second language learners (2014, methodology): “These trials were presented in a block with 3 breaks through the experimental software DMDX (Forster & Forster, 2003).”
- Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ (2004, methodology): “Presentation and timing of stimuli were controlled by DMDX software (Forster & Forster, 2003) on a PC computer.”
- Age-related effects over bilingual language control and executive control* (2013, methodology): “The experiments were controlled by the software DMDX (Forster & Forster, 2003), which recorded participants’ vocal and manual responses.”