The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming

285 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Number of meanings and concreteness: Consequences of ambiguity within and across languages (2007, background): “For example, Finkbeiner, Forster, Nicol, and Nakamura ( 2004 ) hypothesised that translation priming is typically not observed from L2 to L1 because L2 words only share a small subset of the senses of their L1 translation equivalents.”
The automatic access of emotion: Emotional Stroop effects in Spanish–English bilingual speakers (2007, background): “While some models of bilingual memory emphasise the acquisition of the first and second language in terms of developmental principles (eg, Kroll & Stewart, 1994 ), other models that consider word features and characteristics as a basis for their mental representations advocate depictions that are m”
Incremental interpretation in second language sentence processing (2006, background): “This may be because of reduced fluency of access, or, as argued by Finkbeiner et al. (2004) it may be because of differences in the underlying representation of the meanings of L2 words.”
Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers (2010, background): “This might in turn constrain the ability to fully compute some semantic and syntactic nuances that are automatically incorporated during L1 processing (e.g. Finkbeiner et al., 2004; Kotz and Elston-Güttler, 2004; Silverberg and Samuel, 2004).”