Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters

By Sofie Schoonbaert, Jonathan Grainger. 2004

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b516f050c159b469dcf745f068b037458e2f224

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order (2010, methodology): “The match scores for the slot-coding, SOLAR, the Constrained Open Bigram (Schoonbaert & Grainger, 2004), the most recent version of SERIOL (Whitney, 2008; Whitney & Cornelissen, 2008), and the Overlap Open Bigram (Grainger, et al., 2006) models for each of the primes and the target for the stimuli u”
Visual Word Recognition (2007, unknown): “Research using masked form priming (De Moor and Brysbaert, 2000; Drews and Zwitserlood, 1995; Schoonbaert and Grainger, 2004) and simple lexical decision (Davis and Taft, forthcoming) has, however, indicated that these types of letter strings are instead perceived as being highly similar.”
Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition (2008, background): “Taft (1979) compared lexical decision latencies for non-word stimuli like STON (which would be a word if a final ‘e’ were added) with those for non-word stimuli like SLON (which would not be a word even if a final ‘e’ were added).”
The Overlap Model: A Model of Letter Position Coding (2008, unknown): “…in the target are altered by replacement or trans- position to form the prime (e.g., Andrews, 1996; Castles et al., 2003; Christianson, Johnson, & Rayner, 2005; Forster et al., 1987; Guerrera & Forster, 2007; Perea & Carreiras, 2006a, 2006b; Perea & Lupker, 2003b; Schoonbaert & Grainger, 2004).”
Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction (2008, methodology): “Schoonbaert and Grainger (2004) reported evidence that the size of TL-priming effects might depend on word length, with larger priming effects for 7-letter compared with 5-letter words.”
Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition (2009, background): “…priming paradigm in the form of robust priming effects with transposed-letter primes (e.g., gadren-GARDEN: Perea and Lupker 2004; Schoonbaert and Grainger 2004), and subset and superset primes (e.g., grdn-GARDEN, gamrdsen-GARDEN: Peresotti and Grainger 1999; Grainger et al. 2006b; Van Assche…”
Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography (2008, background): “Further, while they are more similar to one another on relative coding schemes such as Wickelcoding (eg, Seidenberg & McClelland, 1989 ), open-bigram coding (eg, Schoonbaert & Grainger, 2004 ), and spatial coding (eg, Davis, 1999 ), the orthographic codes representing ‘trust’ are nevertheless non”
The spatial coding model of visual word identification. (2010, background): “This additional processing time may explain the inhibitory effect of repeated letters on lexical decision latency reported by Schoonbaert and Grainger (2004).”
Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency (2008, background): “Evidence, particularly evidence from the masked priming paradigm (Forster, Davis, Schoknecht, & Carter, 1987; Perea & Lupker, 2003a, 2003b, 2004; Schoonbaert & Grainger, 2004; see also Johnson, Perea, & Rayner, 2007, for evidence based on a manipulation of parafoveal previews during reading),…”