Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry
By Theo E. Notteboom *. 2002
187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81622a2a92470d9b01b9efc92ff4434ecc9954fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Theo E. Notteboom *
- J.P. Rodrigue
- A. Pallis
- F. Parola
- Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
- A. Ng
- W. Yap
- P. D. de Langen
In Strategy and Management
- Theo E. Notteboom *
- A. Pallis
- Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
- W. Yap
- Daniel Olivier
- J.P. Rodrigue
- P. D. de Langen
- B. Slack
Citations in the corpus
- Rethinking the Port (2006, background): “And although there is a growing body of empirical research into these new structures (Heaver, 2002; Notteboom, 2002a; 2002b; Slack et al, 2002b), traditional port geography theories and models appear incapable of capturing contemporary realities.”
- The future of containerization: perspectives from maritime and inland freight distribution (2009, background): “There is an emerging role of multinational corporations (DP World, APM Terminals, Hutchison Port Holdings and PSA to name but a few) that are able to establish their own dedicated infrastructure networks, notably in terms of global port operators (Notteboom, 2002 and Olivier and Slack, 2006).”
- Analysis Of The Benefits Of Intra-Port Competition (2006, background): “Even though this issue has been addressed before from different perspectives (cf. Goss 1999; Defilippi 2004; but also Chlomoudis and Pallis 1998; De Langen 2002; Notteboom 2002), a thorough and complete overview of the effects of intra-port competition, the enabling conditions for intra-port competi”
- PORT GOVERNANCE IN CHINA: A REVIEW OF POLICIES IN AN ERA OF INTERNATIONALIZING PORT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (2004, background): “Mega-carriers have vertically integrated transport terminals in an effort to create global logistics networks as well as a strategy to erect barriers to entry (Musso et al., 2001; Notteboom, 2002).”
- The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping (2017, background): “Since the late 1990s, several port authorities have developed strategies allowing shipping lines to develop dedicated or semi-dedicated terminals aiming to secure ship calls and the associated maritime container volumes (Notteboom, 2002; Parola and Musso, 2007).”
- Dynamics of liner shipping network and port connectivity in supply chain systems: analysis on East Asia (2011, background): “, 2002), contestability in container handling market (Notteboom, 2002), game theory”
- Container Shipping And Ports: An Overview (2004, background): “102 Especially German terminal operators are directly involved in intermodal rail transport (Notteboom, 2002).”
- Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: an update (2010, background): “At present, these operators each manage between five and ten container terminals spread out over the main European gateway regions (Notteboom, 2002; Drewry Shipping Consultants, 2007).”
- Maritime liner shipping and the stevedoring industry: market structure and competition strategies (2005, unknown): “[17]).”
- Transformation of port terminal operations: from the local to the global (2005, background): “Vertical integration is seen as giving these lines control of more links of transport chains (Musso et al., 2001; Notteboom, 2002).”
- The corporate geography of global container terminal operators (2012, background): “The traditional stevedores are thus confronted with larger and fewer shipping lines demanding better service at a lower cost [15].”