Transformation of port terminal operations: from the local to the global

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The corporate geography of global container terminal operators (2012, background): “For instance, Slack and Frémont [10] demonstrate 260 T.”
Why are maritime ports (still) urban, and why should policy-makers care? (2012, background): “In addition, as globalization expanded in the 1990s, foreign firms increasingly took control over port functions and local port firms [20], displacing locally embedded firms with long operating histories and strong 194 P.”
Container Shipping And Ports: An Overview (2004, background): “Musso et al (2001), Slack and Frémont (2004), Brennan (2002) and Cariou (2003) provide a more in-depth analysis on the issue of dedicated terminals.”
Analysis Of The Benefits Of Intra-Port Competition (2006, background): “…the hinterland is largely captive? yes no 6 In 1991, the shipping lines controlled 11% of world container port handling, and by 2001, their share had risen to 19% (Slack and Fremont 2005) 7 In such cases, essential facility regulation may be a means to secure access to port facilities or services.”
A review of port authority functions: towards a renaissance? (2010, background): “Several authors have highlighted the increased power of global terminal operators—of various background and nature—which makes it difficult for port authorities to determine their own destinies, jeopardises their independence in making strategic choices and decreases the coherence of local port comm”